Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.1 RPFLGLOJ CH-VS

Art. 7 Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOJ) - Esercizio della giurisdizione pubblica

Organizzazione Giudiziaria - Generale - Esercizio della Giurisdizione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (55 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 7 RPflG - Esercizio della giurisdizione pubblica · Esercizio della giurisdizione pubblica

1. La giurisdizione amministrativa è esercitata da

a) il Tribunale cantonale;

b) le commissioni di ricorso speciali.

2. La giurisdizione in materia fiscale e di assicurazioni sociali è esercitata dal Tribunale cantonale. Se una sezione del Tribunale cantonale si è occupata in prima istanza di una questione che non rientra nell'articolo 86 comma 2 della Legge federale sul Tribunale federale, si può presentare ricorso presso un'altra sezione del Tribunale cantonale secondo le disposizioni sul procedimento amministrativo.

← Art. 6a RPflG - Tribunale di Polizia Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOJ) - Scopo Art. 8 RPflG - Giudici Comunali →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)

S1 24 129 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 RVG und Art. 81a VVRG)
Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Based on Employment Status Assessment
Cited in the reasoning to establish which court (the Social Insurance Department of the Cantonal Court) is competent.
S2 24 80 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Insurance Coverage for Chronic Pain Physiotherapy
This procedural provision was used by the court to establish its jurisdiction over the case, although this is implicitly covered by the general procedural rules applied.
S2 24 14 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Insurance Benefits Termination Appeal for Work Injury Causation
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the competence of the cantonal court for social security law appeals.
S1 24 34 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 RVG und Art. 81a VVRG)
Appeal Allowed for Insufficient Investigation of Increased Disability Pension Claim
Cited in the reasoning to define which Cantonal Court section is competent.
S1 22 178 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Disability Claim Reinstatement Due to Insufficient Medical Review
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction.
S1 23 6 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Painter's Appeal of Disability Denial Based on Monocular Vision Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to define the court's jurisdiction as the cantonal court for social insurance matters.
S2 23 9 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Claimant v. Insurer: Disability Pension and Impairment Rating Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the cantonal court to hear social security appeals.
S1 22 88 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Travel Company v. Denial of Short-Time Work Compensation (KAE) During Prolonged COVID-19 Impact
This cantonal procedural provision is cited to confirm the court's territorial jurisdiction.
S1 18 115 · vs (art. 7 al. 2, 1ère phrase LOJ)
Disability Benefits Appeal Timeliness Determination
Cited in passing to justify the single-judge decision regarding inadmissibility, but not the ground for the ruling itself.
RVJ 2020 p 85 89 · vs (art. 7 al. 2, 1 re phrase et 19 al. 1 LOJ)
Insurer Communication and Appeal Deadline Upon Representative's Knowledge
Cited in conjunction with other provisions to justify the jurisdiction of the single judge.
S2 12 58 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Bacon Chip v. Accident Insurance Denial Over Foreign Object Proof
Cited in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Court for handling the appeal.
S2 11 19 · vs (Art. 7 Abs. 2 RPflG)
Insurance Benefits Denial for Foot Injury Causality Dispute
This cantonal law provision is cited, together with ATSG and RVG provisions, to establish the competence of the court to hear the case.