172.6 VVRGLPJA

CH-VS

Art. 88 Legge sulla procedura e sulla giurisdizione amministrativa (LPJA) - Costi a) In generale

Costi e Risarcimento delle Parti

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (114 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 88 VVRG · Costi a) In generale

1. Chiunque richieda o renda necessaria una azione ufficiale è tenuto a pagare la tassa stabilita dall'autorità. Può essere obbligato al rimborso totale o parziale delle spese.

2. Qualora più parti abbiano agito insieme, esse sono tenute in solido per i costi, a meno che l'autorità non disponga diversamente. Questa disposizione si applica al caso della rappresentanza congiunta (Art. 11a) e al caso dell'unione di procedimenti (Art. 11b).

3. ...

4. Le spese vive comprendono gli onorari degli esperti, le indennità dei testimoni, nonché gli altri costi causati dall'istruzione della questione.

5. In ogni caso, chi causa un onere inutile è tenuto a sostenerne i costi, anche se ottiene ragione nella questione.

6. Se la raccolta delle prove comporta costi relativamente elevati, l'autorità può subordinare l'assunzione delle stesse al fatto che la parte anticipi i costi entro un termine stabilito.

← Art. 87a VVRG - Procedura Legge sulla procedura e sulla giurisdizione amministrativa (LPJA) - Principio Art. 89 VVRG - b) Nel procedimento di ricorso →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (180)

F1 24 124 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Taxpayer Appeal Regarding 2018 Assessment: Undisclosed Distributions, Loan Disallowance, and Share Valuation

Cited in the dispositive for setting the final amount of the reduced court costs.

A1 24 126 · vs (Art. 88 Abs. 5 VVRG)

Bid Challenge Regarding Plastering Contract Award Dismissed

Cited as the basis for ordering the administrative authority to bear part of the costs due to incomplete document submission.

A1 24 220 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Concerning Communal Importance Classification and Subsidy Request

This provision governs the allocation of costs, which the dispositive orders to be borne by the appellants.

S1 25 64 · vs (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VVRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Refusal to Waive Recovery of Overpaid Unemployment Benefits Due to Gross Negligence

Cited as part of the legal basis determining that the appeal procedure is subject to costs because it does not concern a benefit dispute.

F1 24 117 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Taxpayer Deduction for Wealthy Adult Children

Cited in the context of imposing court costs.

A1 24 122 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Against Car Shelter Demolition Order and Procedural Violations

Applied to confirm the solidarity between the appellants for the payment of the judicial costs.

F1 24 108 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Property Owner Challenges Imputed Rental Value Assessment Based on Market Rate Disparity

Cited in the reasoning for the costs order (which is reflected in order 3).

A1 24 174 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA)

Appeal Against Refusal to Regularize Unauthorized Agricultural Building and Demolition Order Dismissed

This provision dictates the allocation of court costs following the rejection of the appeal.

A1 24 171 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Access to Internal Service Reports Under Transparency Law

Provision used to establish joint and several liability for the appellants concerning the court costs of the current procedure.

A1 25 39 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA)

Traffic Offense License Withdrawal Interpretation Appeal

Provision applied to determine that the costs of the proceedings are charged to the appellant.

A1 24 143 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 5 LPJA)

Neighbors v. Municipality (Underground Garage Permit and Servitude Dispute)

Applied to determine the distribution of court costs (3/4 to the appellants).

A1 24 210 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Against Construction Permit Annulled for Procedural Defects and Insufficient Reasoning

Used to establish the joint liability of A_________ and C_________ for the court fees.

F1 24 90 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Taxpayer Legal Fees Deductibility for Non-Income Related Proceedings

Cited in the order regarding the imposition of costs.

A1 24 123 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 5 et art. 89 al. 4 LPJA)

Construction Permit Appeal Affirmation with Cost Apportionment

Provisions applied to allocate half of the costs to the appellants due to their partial success regarding procedural rights.

A1 24 99 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA ; art. 3 al. 3, 11, 13 al. 1 et 25 LTar)

Neighboring Owners v. Canton on Building Permit for Six Villas

Provisions cited for imposing the case costs on the appellants.