Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
943.11 LPR CH-VD

Art. 4 Legge sui mezzi pubblicitari (LPR) - Procedimenti vietati [ 6 ]

Titolo I
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (34 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 4 LPR - Procedimenti vietati [ 6 ] · Procedimenti vietati [ 6 ]

1. Sono generalmente vietati tutti i mezzi pubblicitari che, per la loro ubicazione, le loro dimensioni, la loro illuminazione, il genere dei soggetti rappresentati, il loro motivo o il rumore che provocano, nuocciono al buon aspetto o alla tranquillità di un sito, di un punto panoramico, di una località, di un quartiere, di una via pubblica, di un lago o di un corso d'acqua, o che possono compromettere la sicurezza stradale, in particolare

a. ogni mezzo pubblicitario su un lago, un corso d'acqua o sulla sua riva, salvo deroghe accordate dal servizio competente per la polizia delle acque, in occasione di manifestazioni di interesse generale, previo preavviso della municipalità;

b. i palloni frenati pubblicitari o recanti pubblicità;

c. ogni mezzo pubblicitario sonoro all'esterno, salvo deroghe accordate dalla municipalità in occasione di manifestazioni di interesse generale o durante campagne politiche, per un periodo limitato;

d. ogni mezzo pubblicitario suscettibile di creare confusione con i segnali e le segnaletiche stradali o di diminuirne l'efficacia;

e. l'utilizzo di un veicolo sprovvisto di targhe di controllo a fini pubblicitari diversi da quelli destinati alla vendita del veicolo.

← Art. 3 LPR - Ambito di applicazione Legge sui mezzi pubblicitari (LPR) - Ma Art. 5 LPR - Protezione del patrimonio e dei siti →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (21)

GE.2024.0351 · vd (art. 4 al. 1 i.f. LPR)
Gas Station Co-owner Appeal Regarding Advertising Sign Placement and Road Safety
The provision that establishes the potential harm to road safety, which was the main ground for rejecting the appeal.
GE.2023.0141 · vd (art. 4 let. d LPR)
Municipality v. Advertising Sign Permit Denial (Road Safety)
This provision regarding the prohibition of advertising harming public appearance or traffic safety was used in the reasoning to support the rejection of the appeal.
GE.2017.0043 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Digital Display Permit Refusal Upheld Against Visual Pollution Concerns
Cited as the general prohibition concerning advertising devices that harm the aspect or tranquility of a site or traffic safety.
GE.2017.0204 · vd (Art. 4 let. d LPR)
LED Screen Advertising Permit Refusal Upheld on Road Safety Grounds
Cited as a legal basis for the justified prohibition of the advertising devices due to potential harm to road safety.
GE.2016.0202 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Mannequin on Public Land Dispute
Cited as a legal basis for prohibiting advertising displays that harm the appearance or tranquility of a site, which justified the decision to deny authorization.
AC.2013.0150 · vd (Art. 4 al. 1 let. a LPR)
Port Operator vs. Property Owners: Retaining Wall and Concession Validity
Cited in the reasoning to explain the general prohibition on advertising signs, against which the court's decision provided an exception (though the exception itself is not cited in the dispositive, this article establishes the rule being overridden by the concession's scope mentioned in the reasoning).
GE.2014.0117 · vd (art. 4 let. d LPR)
Advertising Company v. Municipality (Billboard Installation Safety)
The restriction on the economic freedom was justified by the risk that the billboard could compromise road safety, as stipulated in this article.
GE.2010.0224 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Municipality Advertising Display Refusal Upheld on Traffic Safety Grounds
This cantonal law provision prohibiting advertising that harms the appearance of an area was cited as part of the legal basis for the municipality's decision, although the court ultimately focused on safety.
GE.2010.0078 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Advertising Panel Permit Refusal Overturned Due to Unsubstantiated Restrictions
Cited as the general prohibition principle against advertising detrimental to the site's appearance, forming the basis for the municipality's refusal power.
GE.2003.0115 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Municipality's Refusal to Approve Freestanding Advertising Panels Upheld
Although cited in the reasoning regarding aesthetic protection, it is not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders.
GE.2001.0102 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Business v. Municipality Regarding Advertising Panel Authorization
Cited in the reasoning as the provision generally prohibiting advertising that harms the look or tranquility of a site, justifying the initial municipal refusal which is partially overturned in order II.
GE.2003.0084 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Billboard Authorization Appeal Overturning Municipal Refusal Based on Inapplicable Regulations and Unequal Treatment
This article, dealing with prohibitions based on aspect or traffic safety, forms part of the general legal framework considered in determining the admissibility of the placement.
GE.2002.0037 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Service Station Advertising Panels Appeal
This provision, cited in the reasoning (Considerant 2), sets the prohibition against advertising that harms the appearance or tranquility of a site, which is the core issue regarding the refusal of authorization.
GE.2002.0019 · vd (art. 4 LPR)
Municipality Upheld in Refusing Advertising Panel Permit Based on Comprehensive Advertising Concept
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the prohibition against advertising that harms the appearance or tranquility of a site, but not in the dispositive.
GE.2001.0116 · vd (Art. 4 LPR)
Municipality Advertising Regulation Overturned Due to Arbitrary Zoning
The regulation's restrictive nature was considered contrary to LPR principles regarding prohibitions based on site harm.