832.01.1
RLVLAMAL
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 17 REGOLAMENTO concernente la legge del 25 giugno 1996 d'applicazione vodese della legge federale sull'assicurazione malattie (RLVLAMal) - Limitazione alla condizione economica modesta (art. 9 legge) [ 6 ]
Titolo II, Capitolo I
Art. 17 RLVLAMal - Limitazione alla condizione economica modesta (art. 9 legge) [ 6 ] · Limitazione alla condizione economica modesta (art. 9 legge) [ 6 ]
1. Ai sensi dell'articolo 9, comma 3, della legge, non è in particolare considerata di modeste condizioni economiche la persona che, per scelta personale
a. ha contratto debiti a scopo di investimento, ha utilizzato una parte del suo patrimonio per costituirsi una rendita vitalizia o si è spogliata di tutto o parte dei suoi beni senza un'equa controprestazione;
b. beneficia di prestazioni di mantenimento accordate da una comunità religiosa o assimilata;
c. ha intenzionalmente e liberamente rinunciato a mettere a disposizione tutta la sua capacità di guadagno;
d. rinuncia scientemente a prestazioni cui potrebbe avere diritto in virtù di un'altra assicurazione sociale.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)
LAVAM.6.22.3.2023 · vd (art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)
Insured v. Subsidy Authority (Medical Limitation on Earning Capacity)
This cantonal regulation provision defines when a person is not considered to be of modest economic condition due to a deliberate choice not to use their full earning capacity, which was central to the initial denial of subsidies.
LAVAM.4.22.9.2022 · vd (Art. 17 RLVLAMal)
Claimant v. State Insurance Fund (Health Insurance Subsidies)
Cited as the detailed criteria (specifically art. 17 let. c) used to deny the subsidy for periods where the appellant deliberately limited her earning capacity.
Arr.t.2022.283 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMAL)
Appeal Dismissed: Voluntary Renunciation of Employment Precludes Health Insurance Subsidy Eligibility
This provision was cited in the final order (III) as it further specified the scenario where the applicant intentionally and freely renounced putting their earning capacity to use.
Arr.t.2018.634 · vd (art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)
Revocation of Subsidy Upheld Due to Lack of Job Search Documentation
This provision was cited as the basis for confirming the appellant is not considered an insured person of modest economic condition due to intentionally waiving their earning capacity.
Arr.t.2017.789 · vd (Art. 17 RLVLAMal)
Insured Denied Premium Subsidies Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts
The court found that the appellant's situation met the criteria of the 3rd hypothesis of this article (intentionally renouncing the utilization of earning capacity), leading to the confirmation of the decision to deny subsidies.
Arr.t.2016.81 · vd (Art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)
Provisional Resident Denied Health Subsidies Due to Public Assistance and Employment Status
Cited as part of the legal basis for denying the right to subsidies because the appellant chose not to use their earning capacity.
Arr.t.2015.1058 · vd (Art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Upheld for Voluntary Underemployment
This provision specifies the cantonal interpretation of Art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal regarding the voluntary renunciation of full earning capacity, forming the direct legal basis for confirming the refusal of the subsidy.
Arr.t.2014.317 · vd (Art. 17 al. 1 let. a à c RLVLAMal)
Insurance Subsidy Eligibility Based on Intentional Unemployment
This article specifies the conditions under which a person is not considered to be of modest economic status due to deliberate choice, aligning with the grounds for rejecting the subsidy.
Arr.t.2014.117 · vd (Art. 17 RLVLAMal)
Appeal Dismissed: Denial of 2013 Health Insurance Subsidies Upheld Due to Voluntary Income Limitation
The court confirmed the decision because the appellant's situation met the criteria defined in this article (specifically the 3rd hypothesis, concerning voluntarily foregoing earning capacity).
Arr.t.2013.312 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMal)
Insured Pastor Denied Health Insurance Subsidies Due to Maintenance Benefits and Partial Employment
The court confirmed that the appellant's situation met the third hypothesis of Art. 17 RLVLAMal, leading to the rejection of the subsidy claim.
Arr.t.2011.370 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMal)
Insured Person v. Controlling Body (Health Insurance Subsidy Termination)
Used to establish that the appellant is not considered to be of modest economic condition because he intentionally renounced using his full earning capacity.
Arr.t.2010.1323 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMal)
Ministers' Health Insurance Subsidy Appeal over Voluntary Income Forfeiture
Cited as the cantonal regulation detailing specific situations where a person is not considered of modest economic standing.