700.11 LATC

CH-VD

Art. 46 Legge sulla pianificazione del territorio e sulle costruzioni (LATC) - Zone riservate

Titolo III, Capitolo II, Sezione IV

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (139 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 46 LATC - Zone riservate · Zone riservate

1. I comuni o il dipartimento possono stabilire delle zone riservate ai sensi dell'articolo 27 LAT [A]. Queste zone vietano o limitano la possibilità di edificare sui terreni per un periodo massimo di cinque anni, che può essere prorogato di ulteriori tre anni al massimo.

2. La procedura di approvazione è quella dei piani di destinazione urbanistica.

← Art. 45 LATC - Procedura semplificata Legge sulla pianificazione del territorio e sulle costruzioni (LATC) - Scopi Art. 47 LATC - Piani in fase di elaborazione →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (65)

AC.2024.0137 · vd (art. 46 LATC)

Landowners v. Municipality and Cantonal Department on Zoning Reserved Zone

This provision was cited in the request for establishing the zone réservée (ZR) and is the basis for the decision being challenged and ultimately confirmed by rejecting the appeal.

AC.2024.0137 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC)

Landowners v. Municipality and Cantonal Department on Zoning Reserved Zone

Cited in the reasoning in connection with the local implementation of ZR provisions.

AC.2024.0043 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC)

Heirs v. Cantonal Authority on Reserved Zone Extension

The main ground for confirming the decision was the sufficient legal basis provided by this article for the provisional establishment and prolongation of the cantonal reserved zone.

AC.2023.0429 · vd (art. 46 LATC)

Landowners Appeal Denial of Building Permit for ISOS Site Due to Impending Zoning Revision

Cited in jurisprudence related to the mandatory application of art. 49 LATC concerning reserved zones.

AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 46 LATC)

Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision

Cited as the basis for the cantonal department's decision concerning the approval of the reserve zone plan.

AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 46 LATC)

Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision

The decision being appealed involved the approval of a reserve zone plan, which is governed by this article.

AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC)

Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision

Cited in the reasoning to define the duration and possibility of extension for reserve zones under Vaudois law.

AC.2022.0114 · vd (art. 46 LATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Reserved Zone Approval

Cited in the reasoning regarding the legal basis for zone réservée, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.

AC.2023.0342 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC, en lien avec l'art. 27 al. 2 LAT)

Cantonal Land Reservation Extension Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge

This provision constitutes the legal basis for the prolongation of the cantonal reserved zone, which was the subject of the dispute and confirmed in the final order.

AC.2023.0345 · vd (Art. 46 LATC)

Owner Appeal Against Cantonal Zone Extension Overlapping Municipal Zone

The court's decision to annul the extension of the cantonal reserved zone is based on the provincial law concerning reserved zones, which the court deemed incompatible with federal law.

AC.2022.0348 · vd (Art. 46 LATC)

Property Owner v. Canton: Reserved Zone Plan Challenge

The court's reasoning, which ultimately rejected the appeal, was based on confirming that the reserved zone plan complied with the cantonal equivalent of Art. 27 LAT.

AC.2022.0320 · vd (Art. 46 LATC)

Property Owners Challenge Reserved Zone Plan Permissiveness

Cited in the reasoning as the cantonal law counterpart to Art. 27 LAT regarding the establishment of reserved zones, which the court ultimately found was not violated.

AC.2022.0322 · vd (art. 46 LATC)

Challenge to Communal Reserved Zone Plan and Cantonal Approval

The court confirmed the decision regarding the reserved zone, which falls under the procedure described in this article.

AC.2022.0339 · vd (Art. 46 ss LATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality and Canton on Reserved Zone Inclusion

The court annulled the decisions because the application of conservatory measures (Art. 46 ss LATC) to the parcel was contrary to the instructions given in the previous cantonal court ruling.

AC.2022.0324 · vd (art. 46 LATC)

Property Owner Challenge to Municipal Reserved Zone Plan Dismissed

This cantonal provision concerning the establishment of reserved zones was cited as the procedural basis for the administrative decisions under review.