700.11.1 RLATC

CH-VD

Art. 39 Regolamento di applicazione della legge del 4 dicembre 1985 sulla pianificazione territoriale e le costruzioni (RLATC) - Dipendenze di poca importanza e altri adattamenti assimilati

Titolo II, Capitolo I, Sezione IV

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (65 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 39 RLATC - Dipendenze di poca importanza e altri adattamenti assimilati · Dipendenze di poca importanza e altri adattamenti assimilati

1. In mancanza di disposizioni comunali contrarie, i comuni possono autorizzare la costruzione di pertinenze di scarsa importanza, il cui utilizzo è collegato all'occupazione dell'edificio principale, negli spazi regolamentari tra edifici o tra edifici e confini di proprietà.

2. Per pertinenze di scarsa importanza si intendono costruzioni separate dal corpo principale dell'edificio, senza comunicazione interna con questo ultimo e il cui volume è di scarsa importanza rispetto a quello dell'edificio principale, come padiglioni, casette da giardino o garage privati per al massimo due auto. Queste pertinenze non possono in alcun caso essere utilizzate come abitazione o per attività professionali.

3. Queste regole sono valide anche per altre opere diverse dalle pertinenze propriamente dette: muri di sostegno, recinzioni, parcheggi all'aperto, in particolare.

4. Tali costruzioni possono essere autorizzate solo a condizione che non arrechino alcun pregiudizio ai vicini.

5. Sono riservate in particolare le disposizioni del codice rurale e fondiario [M] e della legge vodese di introduzione al Codice civile, nonché quelle relative alla prevenzione degli incendi [N] e ai campeggi e caravaning [O].

← Art. 38 RLATC Regolamento di applicazione della legge del 4 dicembre 1985 sulla pianificazione territoriale e le costruzioni (RLATC), Allegato 3: Allegato III Art. 40 RLATC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (86)

AC.2025.0120 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Parking Structure

The court implicitly found a violation of this provision (referenced via Art. 67 al. 1 RPGA) concerning the classification and impact of the structure as a dependency, leading to the permit's annulment.

AC.2024.0137 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Landowners v. Municipality and Cantonal Department on Zoning Reserved Zone

Cited in the proposed substituted text for Article 3 RZR, which was considered but ultimately not adopted in the final orders.

AC.2023.0387 · vd (Art. 39 al. 2 RLATC)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit and Tree Removal

This provision defining minor annexes is cited in the reasoning but not in the dispositive orders (I to IV).

AC.2023.0320 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Building Permit Challenge)

The court used this provision to qualify the proposed shed and garden hut as dependencies of minor importance, which allowed their placement in regulatory spaces.

AC.2022.0301 · vd (art. 39 al. 4 RLATC)

Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Multi-Unit Development Approval Despite Objections to Basement, Parking, and Landscaping

The court confirmed that the ramp did not cause prejudice to neighbors that would be unbearable without excessive sacrifice, as required by this article regarding structures in regulatory spaces.

AC.2022.0209 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Neighboring Property Owners v. Municipality (Building Permit Refusal for Villa Enlargement)

Mentioned in relation to the definition of 'minor dependency' exceptions under the RZR.

AC.2021.0343 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Unattached Villas Violating Minimum Separation Distance

Used to assess whether the projected swimming pools could be considered 'dependencies of little importance' under this provision.

AC.2021.0343 · vd (art. 39 al. 4 RLATC)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Unattached Villas Violating Minimum Separation Distance

Used to check whether the swimming pools would cause appreciable prejudice to the neighbors, which the court found they did not.

AC.2021.0190 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Planting Boxes and Right-of-Way Servitude

The court implicitly confirmed that the decision on the construction permit (bacs à plantes) did not violate this provision regarding prejudice to neighbors.

AC.2021.0206 · vd (Art. 39 RLATC)

Neighbors v. Municipality (Retaining Wall Height)

This article, which assimilates retaining walls to annexes, was cited in the reasoning for analyzing the legality of the retaining wall within the regulatory space.

AC.2020.0250 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Owner's Appeal Against Municipal Demolition and Compliance Orders for Annexes and Poultry Shed

Cited in the reasoning for determining the admissibility of annexes ECA 103b and 103c as minor dependencies.

AC.2019.0105 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Appeal Against Municipal Construction Restriction in Reserved Zone

Cited in relation to the limitations imposed by the reserved zone regulation on minor annexes (Art. 3 al. 2 RZR).

AC.2020.0078 · vd (art. 39 al. 2 RLATC)

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial for Mezzanine Enlargements and Garage Modifications

The court partially admitted the appeal, overturning the refusal concerning the car cover based on jurisprudence interpreting this provision regarding dependencies of little importance.

AC.2019.0236 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Building Permit Appeal)

The court confirmed the municipal decision based on the analysis regarding the authorization of ancillary buildings in regulatory spaces, especially concerning the absence of excessive prejudice to neighbors (Art. 39 al. 4 RLATC).

AC.2019.0296 · vd (Art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Fence Non-Conformities

Cited in the reasoning section to assess the conformity of the fence (palissade) with construction law provisions, which directly affects the decision on the merits of the appeal.