173.61
LJT
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 3 Legge sulla giurisdizione del lavoro (LJT) - Principio
Capitolo I
Art. 3 LJT - Principio · Principio
1. Non può essere derogata la competenza del tribunale dei prud'hommes se non attraverso una clausola compromissoria che vincoli le parti e sia inserita in un contratto collettivo di lavoro. Gli articoli 10 e 23 della legge sul servizio di impiego e affitto di servizio [A] sono riservati.
2. Le controversie tra una collettività pubblica o un ente pubblico e un funzionario nominato non sono soggette alle disposizioni della presente legge.
3. Salvo disposizione contraria, in particolare quelle previste dalla legge sul personale dello Stato di Vaud [D], le persone assunte con contratto da una collettività pubblica o da un ente pubblico possono adire le autorità competenti in materia di giurisdizione del lavoro, conformemente alle presenti disposizioni.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (11)
GE.2021.0027 · vd (Art. 3 al. 3 LJT)
Employment Contract Termination Jurisdiction Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that disputes concerning an employee engaged by contract fall under the jurisdiction of the labour courts, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal before this court.
GE.2020.0172 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)
Director Employment Termination Contractual vs. Administrative Dispute
The court used this provision to establish that the litigation concerning the termination of the contract falls under the jurisdiction of the labour courts.
HC.2019.45 · vd (Art. 3 LJT)
Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction Over Employment Contract Debt
This provision was explicitly cited in the text to define the scope of competence regarding labor jurisdiction, which was the core issue resolved in the decision.
GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 2 et 3 LJT)
Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning to determine that labor jurisdiction (civil) is competent, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).
GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 LJT)
Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning regarding the primacy of the labour jurisdiction law over administrative recourse provisions, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).
GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 2 LJT)
Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning to exclude the case from the non-application to civil servants, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).
GE.2016.0156 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)
Municipality Worker Contract Termination Appeal Dismissed Over Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning to classify the appellant as an employee engaged by contract by a public entity, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).
GE.2016.0100 · vd (art. 3 LJT)
Jurisdiction Dispute Over Private Law Employment Contract Termination by Municipality
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the dispute falls under the jurisdiction of the labor courts, which justifies the administrative appeal being inadmissible.
HC.2016.196 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 LJT)
Liability for Unpaid Wages Against Individuals Operating an Unregistered Company
Cited in the preamble, justifying the imperative nature of the Labor Court's jurisdiction.
HC.2013.837 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 LJT)
Municipality Hiring Dispute: Public Service Law Jurisdiction Upheld
Used to determine that the dispute concerning the engagement of a civil servant by a public entity is not subject to the Labour Jurisdiction Act.
HC.2009.261 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LJT)
Municipality Employment Contract Dispute Jurisdiction
This provision is the main legal ground for reforming the first instance decision to confirm the competence of the Labour Tribunal for an employee engaged by contract by a public entity.