173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 87 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPA-VD) - Misure di estrema urgenza
Capitolo IV
Art. 87 LPA-VD - Misure di estrema urgenza · Misure di estrema urgenza
1. Se vi è pericolo nel ritardo, l'autorità può ordinare misure ai sensi dell'articolo 86 immediatamente, senza sentire la parte avversa.
2. In tal caso, l'autorità concede un breve termine alla parte avversa per esprimersi, quindi emette, anch'essa a breve termine, una decisione che conferma o annulla le misure ordinate.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (6)
2.2019 · vd (art. 87 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Conflict of Interest Allegations in Litigation: Denial of Provisional Measures
Cited in the reasoning to explain the requirements for ordering measures immediately without hearing the other party, which was relevant to rejecting the urgency request.
AC.2015.0362 · vd (art. 87 LPA-VD)
Developer Appeal of Occupancy Permit Condition Regarding Solar Collectors
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of requesting urgent provisional measures.
Ord.2010.11 · vd (Art. 87 LPA-VD)
Pension Fund Lump-Sum Payment Order
Cited at the beginning, indicating the legal basis for the judge's actions concerning provisional measures, although its specific application is implied by the issuance of the orders rather than explicitly named in the dispositive orders I-III.
AI.7.09 · vd (Art. 87 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Disability Pension Appeal and Denial of Urgent Measure for Retroactive Payment
Cited to explain the condition for ordering provisional measures immediately without hearing the adverse party (peril in delay), which the court ultimately found not met.
AA.43.08.33.2009 · vd (Art. 87 LPA-VD)
Rejection of Provisional Measures Application Due to Lack of Imminent Danger and Failure to Hear Opposing Party
The urgent provisional measure request was rejected based on the conditions outlined in this article.
AA.43.08.33.2009 · vd (art. 87 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Rejection of Provisional Measures Application Due to Lack of Imminent Danger and Failure to Hear Opposing Party
The court found that the requirements for ruling without hearing the opposing party under this specific paragraph were not met.