173.36
LPA-VDLJPA
CH-VD
Art. 68 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPA-VD) - Forma e termine
Capitolo III, Sezione III
Art. 68 LPA-VD · Forma e termine
1. Il reclamo si esercita mediante atto scritto e sommariamente motivato entro trenta giorni dalla notifica della decisione impugnata.
2. Il termine per proporre reclamo contro le decisioni incidentali è di dieci giorni.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (20)
AC.2024.0066 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 let. a et 102 LPA-VD)
Equestrian Center Demolition Permit Denial Upheld Due to Proposed Rezoning
Implied by the order to pay costs to the opposing parties (procedural provisions for costs in cantonal law).
AC.2022.0114 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Reserved Zone Approval
Implicitly applied as the basis for charging costs in line with procedural law, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders III-VI.
AC.2022.0114 · vd (Art. 68 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Reserved Zone Approval
Implicitly applied as the basis for charging costs in line with procedural law, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders III-VI.
AC.2023.0038 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Cantonal Reserved Zone Approval Upheld Pending Land Use Plan Revision
Applied to award costs (dépens) to the Commune of Missy.
AC.2021.0074 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Residents v. Municipality: Annulment of Building Permit Due to Insufficient Traffic Noise Justification
Although not explicitly cited in the orders, costs are determined based on the outcome and local procedural law, typically referenced when costs are imposed (Order IV).
AC.2021.0074 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Residents v. Municipality: Annulment of Building Permit Due to Insufficient Traffic Noise Justification
Although not explicitly cited in the orders, costs are determined based on the outcome and local procedural law, typically referenced when costs are imposed (Order V).
AC.2021.0074 · vd (art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Residents v. Municipality: Annulment of Building Permit Due to Insufficient Traffic Noise Justification
Although not explicitly cited in the orders, costs are determined based on the outcome and local procedural law, typically referenced when costs are imposed (Order IV).
AC.2021.0074 · vd (art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Residents v. Municipality: Annulment of Building Permit Due to Insufficient Traffic Noise Justification
Although not explicitly cited in the orders, costs are determined based on the outcome and local procedural law, typically referenced when costs are imposed (Order V).
PE.2022.0079 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Appeal of Inadmissible Opposition to Deportation Order Due to Untimely Filing
This provision sets the time limit for filing an objection, which was the core issue of the underlying administrative decision being reviewed.
Arr.t.2022.339 · vd (Art. 68 LPA-VD)
Appeal Dismissed: Untimely Health Insurance Subsidy Claim
Cited at the beginning, this provision defines the formal requirements for filing an objection/claim, which was the basis for deeming the initial claim inadmissible (tardiveté).
AC.2020.0204 · vd (Art. 68 al. 2 et 3 LPA-VD)
Municipal Construction Permit Overturned Due to Setback and Firefighting Access Violations
Cited for the decision regarding the allocation of costs to the parties, including the reduction of the indemnity for appellants A. and B. due to the late intervention of their counsel.
GE.2020.0235 · vd (art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
License Withdrawal Appeal Following Remand and Proof of Timely Objection
Cited as the rule governing the formal requirements and deadline (30 days) for filing a reclamation.
BO.2019.0022 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Educational Grant Forgiveness Appeal Timeliness Due to Improper Notification Method
The court's decision hinges on interpreting the deadline set by this article for filing a formal claim (réclamation).
MPU.2018.0019 · vd (Art. 68 LPA-VD)
Contractor Appeal of Public Contract Award Based on Evaluation Criteria Upheld
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive (orders III and IV), this article governs cantonal court costs and indemnities, which are addressed in orders III and IV.
AC.2016.0420 · vd (Art. 68 LPA-VD)
Property Owner v. Cantonal Authority on Reserved Zone for Undeveloped Land
This article, governing costs in the Cantonal Court, is implicitly applied by Order III imposing costs, but since it is not explicitly cited in Orders I-IV, it is excluded based on the strict inclusion rule.