173.36 LPA-VDLJPA

CH-VD

Art. 58 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPA-VD) - Decisioni esecutive

Capitolo II, Sezione IX

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (122 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 58 LPA-VD - Decisioni esecutive · Decisioni esecutive

1. Una decisione è esecutiva

a. quando non può più essere impugnata tramite un mezzo di ricorso ordinario, o

b. quando il mezzo di ricorso ordinario non ha effetto sospensivo, o

c. quando l'effetto sospensivo è ritirato.

← Art. 57 LPA-VD - Ripartizione Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPA-VD) - Oggetto Art. 59 LPA-VD - Autorità di esecuzione →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (5)

RE.2024.0006 · vd (Art. 58 let. c LPA-VD)

Municipality Employee Termination Suspension Appeal

Cited to explain the authority's power to withdraw the suspensive effect in the first instance.

RE.2017.0014 · vd (Art. 58 let. c LPA-VD)

Appeal Regarding Lifting of Suspension of Municipal Authorization for Unstable Retaining Wall Near Railway Lines

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the possibility of withdrawing the suspensive effect from a potential incidental appeal.

GE.2014.0096 · vd (art. 58 let. c LPA-VD)

Incidental Appeals on Definitive Closure Decisions Inadmissible Without Principal Appeals

Used in the reasoning (Considerant 4) to affirm that the administrative decisions were immediately enforceable due to the withdrawal of suspensive effect.

CR.2011.0007 · vd (Art. 58 al. 1 let. c LPA-VD)

Driver Fails to Overturn Indefinite License Withdrawal for Driving While Already Disqualified

This provision was used by the lower authority, and referenced by the court, to establish that the decision was enforceable because the suspensive effect was withdrawn.

PE.2010.0584 · vd (art. 58 LPA-VD)

Appeal Regarding Residence Permit Extension Refusal and Deportation Due to Lack of Integration and Social Assistance Dependence

Cited in the reasoning section to establish that the prior decision became final and enforceable due to lack of contestation, which indirectly supports the main decision to reject the appeal (though the dispositive itself does not explicitly cite it for the rejection, it is the procedural basis mentioned in the grounds for upholding the SPOP decision).