951.1
VRP
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 88 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (VRP) - Casi di reclamo
Terza Parte: Tutela Giurisdizionale nelle Controversie Amministrative - F. Ricorso per Denegata Giustizia
Art. 88 VRP - Casi di reclamo · Casi di reclamo
1. Ricorso per diniego di giustizia può essere presentato, a condizione che non vi sia un altro rimedio legale ordinario disponibile o pendente.
2. Con il ricorso per diniego di giustizia si può far valere che un'autorità
a) rifiuti di compiere un atto d'ufficio prescritto o ne ritardi ingiustificatamente l'esecuzione;
b) abbia abusato del potere pubblico o si sia resa colpevole di un'azione o omissione punibile;
c) abbia agito altresì in maniera arbitraria nell'esercizio delle sue competenze.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (64)
B.2024.84 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VRP)
Administrative Delay in Permit Appeal Dismissed Due to Prioritization of Fundamental Rights Cases
Cited to establish the basis for the appeal against denial/delay of legal action (Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde).
B.2024.38 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VRP)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Security Deposit and Denied Reopening of Prior Rulings
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal against refusal of service/delay, which was rejected in Order 1.
B.2023.62 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 lit. a VRP)
Road Asphalting Appeal Timeliness and Exhaustion of Remedies
This provision defined the distinction between denial of justice (Rechtsverweigerung) and delay in justice (Rechtsverzögerung), which was central to the court's reasoning regarding the application of time limits.
B.2023.62 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 lit. a VRP)
Municipality Road Paving Delay vs. Denial of Recourse Deadline
This provision defines the grounds for a legal remedy against refusal or delay of legal action, which was the core issue being reviewed regarding the lower court's decision.
23.1310 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 Bst. a VRP)
Partial Grant of Access and Traffic Injunction
This article was cited in the reasoning to define formal refusal of service, which the court found present regarding the document inspection request, leading to the appeal being heard despite potential timeliness issues under Art. 90 VRP.
22.5920 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 Bst. a VRP)
Property Owner v. Authority Regarding Street Widening Refusal Timeliness
Cited as the legal basis defining the grounds for a legal refusal complaint, which the court used to categorize the appellant's claim as a formal refusal in the narrower sense.
22.3095 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VRP)
Appeal Granted Against Refusal to Act on Unlawful Conversion and Coop Renovation in Water Protection Zone
The appeal was allowed based on the grounds for a right of denial appeal being met.
RDRM.2022.59 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 Bst. a VRP)
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Current Legal Interest and Inherent Placement Rules
Cited to explain the nature of the formal refusal to proceed claim (Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde), which dictates the scope of the appellate body's decision.
B.2022.119 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 lit. a VRP)
Municipality Zoning Decision Competency Dispute
Cited as the basis for qualifying the appeal as a complaint against refusal of official action (Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde) because no ordinary appeal was available against the preliminary ruling.
B.2022.119 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 lit. a VRP)
Competence for Preliminary Planning Decision
The court ruled that the previous appeal should have been qualified as a Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde because the authority refused to perform a prescribed official act (issuing the Vorbescheid).
B.2022.77 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 lit. a VRP)
Administrative Delay Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Current Legal Interest
This provision defines the grounds for a legal remedy against the refusal or unjustified delay of an official act, although the court ultimately decided not to rule on the substance due to lack of interest.
B.2022.44.B.2022.45 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 2 Ingress und lit. a VRP)
Asylum Seekers' Appeals on Social Assistance and Emergency Aid Dismissed
This provision governs the possibility of filing a legal refusal complaint, which the court ultimately dismissed.
B.2022.44.B.2022.45 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VRP)
Asylum Seeker Social Assistance and Relocation Appeals Dismissal
Although cited in the introductory text describing the case, the decision to dismiss the appeal B 2022/44 (Rechtsverweigerungsbeschwerde) only cites procedural rules in the dispositive regarding costs and legal aid, not Art. 88 Abs. 1 VRP as the basis for the final order on the merits.
21.9028 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VRP)
Complaint Upheld Against Municipal Council for Refusal to Act on Unauthorized Paragliding Operations
The appeal was granted based on this provision because the respondent failed to decide on the requests, constituting a formal refusal to act.
B.2021.237 · sg (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VRP)
Applicants' Appeal of Emergency Aid Assignment Dismissed as Challenge to Final Administrative Act
Cited in the introductory summary as the basis for the appeal type being reviewed, though the final order 1. does not explicitly cite it.