951.1 VRP

CH-SG

Art. 83 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (VRP) - Termine

Terza Parte: Tutela Giurisdizionale nelle Cause Amministrative - E. Richiesta di Riapertura del Procedimento

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (138 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 83 VRP · Termine

1. La richiesta di revisione può essere presentata entro tre mesi dal momento in cui l'interessato è venuto a conoscenza del motivo di revisione, ma al più tardi entro dieci anni dalla notifica del provvedimento o della decisione.

2. La richiesta di revisione, con la quale si sostiene che il provvedimento o la decisione sia stato influenzato da dolo o da un'azione punibile, non è soggetta a termini.

← Art. 82 VRP - Istanze Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (VRP) - Ambito di Applicazione a) Principio Art. 84 VRP - Effetto sospensivo →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (5)

B.2017.108 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)

Driver's License Reopening Denial Following Conditional Reinstatement

Cited to establish the deadline for filing the reopening request (used to confirm timeliness).

B.2017.108 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)

Resumption of Proceedings Denied Due to Loss of Legal Interest Following Lifting of Provisional License Suspension

Cited in the reasoning to establish the timeliness of the application, but the final order only mandates non-entry into the merits.

B.2012.81 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)

Tax Revision Denial for Cross-Border Commuter Status

Cited in the reasoning as part of the procedural rules establishing the 90-day deadline for filing a revision request.

B.2012.81 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)

Tax Revision Denial Upheld Due to Untimely Submission and Lack of Obvious Error

Cited in the reasoning as the applicable procedural rule regarding the 90-day deadline for filing a revision request.

II.1.2011.2 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 und 2 VRP)

Heir Standing to Revoke Land Acquisition Permit After Estate Representative Appointment

These articles concerning the timelines for reopening requests were cited in the reasoning section to establish the procedural framework, although the final order was based on inadmissibility/lack of standing (Art. 81 VRP principle). However, since they were only cited in the reasoning (2.a) and not in the dispositive orders 1-3, they should typically be excluded based on the strict rule. But they are included here because the rule states to include procedural rules applied in the dispositive. Since the dispositive does not explicitly cite any procedural rule, these are excluded based on the primary rule focusing only on provisions explicitly cited in orders 1, 2, and 3.