Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
951.1 VRP CH-SG

Art. 105 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (VRP) - b) Azioni, Tolleranze, Omissioni

Quinta Parte: Esecuzione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (138 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 105 VRP · b) Azioni, Tolleranze, Omissioni

1. Se il provvedimento o la decisione è diretto all'esecuzione di un'azione, alla tolleranza o all'astensione, l'esecuzione forzata avviene, se necessario con l'ausilio della polizia, mediante l'esecuzione surrogata da parte dell'autorità o di un terzo da essa incaricato, oppure attraverso costrizione diretta.

2. Salvo che non vi sia pericolo nel ritardo, il mezzo di coazione deve essere minacciato fissando un termine ragionevole.

3. L'esecuzione forzata mediante esecuzione surrogata o mediante costrizione diretta non trova applicazione nelle questioni tributarie.

← Art. 104 VRP Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (VRP) - Ambito di Applicazione a) Principio Art. 106 VRP - Minaccia della pena per disobbedienza →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (16)

23.8154 · sg (Art. 105 VRP)
Cost Allocation Review in Mandatory Restoration Works Execution
Cited in the introductory summary as context for the rules governing the enforcement measure of substitution (Ersatzvornahme).
22.8018 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 1 VRP)
Property Owner Fails to Overturn Mandated Forecourt Restoration for Illegal Development
Cited in the reasoning concerning the mechanism of enforcement through substituted performance (Ersatzvornahme).
22.8018 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 2 VRP)
Property Owner Fails to Overturn Mandated Forecourt Restoration for Illegal Development
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement to set a deadline before enforcement by substituted performance.
B.2023.17 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 2 VRP)
Appeal Dismissed Against Refusal to Entertain Appeal on Enforcement of Demolition Order
Cited in the introduction, and relevant contextually as the court discusses the possibility of agreeing on a deadline within the legally permissible framework (Art. 105 Abs. 2 VRP) during enforcement discussions.
23.1145 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 1 VRP)
Appeal Dismissed: Substitute Tree Maintenance Order Upheld
This provision establishes the basis for enforcement measures like substitute performance (Ersatzvornahme) when an action ordered in a decision is not carried out.
B.2022.72 · sg (Art. 105 VRP)
Barn Demolition for Unauthorized Structural Changes Upheld
Mentioned earlier in the text regarding the sanction (Ersatzvornahme) threatened for non-compliance, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (1, 2, 3).
20.7555 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 1 VRP)
Substitute Performance for Unlawful Landfill: Lawfulness of Enforcement Order
Cited in the reasoning section as the general basis for coercive measures like substitute performance (Ersatzvornahme), which is the core subject of the decision, although the final orders do not explicitly cite it.
20.2455 · sg (Art. 105 VRP)
Enforcement of Planning Regulations: Partial Demolition of Unlawfully Renovated Barn
Cited in the final order (Point 2.b) to threaten enforcement through substitute performance (Ersatzvornahme) if the demolition order is not followed.
B.2021.15 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 1 VRP)
Administrative Court Upholds Demolition Order for Unlawful Agricultural Zone Constructions
This provision concerns the order for direct enforcement (Ersatzvornahme) and forms the basis for the decision regarding the appeal against this order.
B.2021.15 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 1 VRP)
Administrative Court Upholds Demolition Order for Illegal Agricultural Structures
This provision was the legal basis for the administrative order regarding enforcement by substitute performance that was subject to the appeal.
B.2020.209 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 1 VRP)
Substitute Execution Challenge Dismissed Despite Procedural Error
The appeal regarding the order for substituted performance (Ersatzvornahme) was dismissed based on this provision, as no admissible objections against it were raised.
B.2020.209 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 1 VRP)
Administrative Court Upholds Appeal on Excessive Formalism, Dismisses Merit Challenge to Enforcement Order
Cited in the reasoning section to frame the appeal against the refusal to rule on the enforcement order (Ersatzvornahme).
20.2868 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 2 VRP)
Appeal Against Demolition Order and Threat of Substitute Performance Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the threat of substitute performance (Ersatzvornahme) was correctly issued.
20.2868 · sg (Art. 105 Abs. 2 VRP)
Appeal Against Demolition Order Enforcement and Procedural Fee Imposition
Used to confirm that the threat of substitute performance (Ersatzvornahme) was correctly issued.
I.2.2012.29 · sg (Art. 105 VRP (sGS 951.1))
Appeal Concerning Cost Recovery Following Demolition of Structurally Connected Shed
This article regulates the administrative execution and is referenced as corresponding in content to Art. 131 BauG concerning the costs of execution.