134.1
GOG
CH-OW
CH-OW
Art. 66 Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (GOG) - b. Motivi di reclamo
Giustizia Amministrativa - Tribunale Amministrativo
Art. 66 GOG Art. 66 GOG - b. Motivi di reclamo · b. Motivi di reclamo
1. La parte ricorrente può contestare con ricorso amministrativo
a. Violazione del diritto, compreso l'eccesso e l'abuso del potere discrezionale;
b. Accertamento errato o incompleto dei fatti rilevanti ai fini giuridici;
c. Disproporzione nella valutazione
1. di provvedimenti fiscali compresi le sanzioni tributarie, salvo nei casi di accertamenti fiscali discrezionali,
2. di pretese risarcitorie di diritto pubblico,
3. di pretese civilistiche ai sensi dell'Articolo 6 numero 1 della CEDU, quando la legislazione o il diritto dei trattati internazionali prevede o dichiara ammissibile tale contestazione,
4. * di controversie in materia di sicurezza sociale o quando la legislazione lo prevede.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (16)
VVGE.1976.77.Nr.43 · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Clear Request and Substantiation
Cited as the legal basis requiring a reasoned appeal to be filed within 20 days.
VVGE.1978.80.Nr.61 · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Property Owner v. Local Council: Street Name Change and Appeal Period
This provision addresses the start of the appeal period when there is a failure to provide legal recourse instructions, and it was applied to determine that the appeal period had not yet begun.
VVGE.1985.86.Nr.49 · ow (Art. 66 Abs. 1 GOG)
District Municipality Exclusion from Tax Allocation Proceedings
Cited in the dispositive to assign court costs to the losing party.
VVGE.1989.90.Nr.56 · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Restaurant License Appeal: Labor Market Concerns vs. Needs Clause
Cited as the basis for the requirement that administrative court appeals must be filed in writing and substantiated within 20 days.
VVGE.1997.98.Nr.47 · ow (Art. 66 Abs. 1 Bst. a und c GOG)
Cantonal Cost Coverage for Out-of-Canton Hospitalizations
These provisions relate to the court's decision on costs, implying that costs would be allocated based on the outcome of the appeal.
VVGE.1999.00.Nr.41 · ow (Art. 66 Bst. a und b GOG)
Municipality Autonomy Upheld Against Subjective Higher Authority Interference in Zoning
These provisions were cited when overturning the lower court's decision due to incorrect findings of fact regarding the 'public road' status, leading to the conclusion that the lower court's decision was unlawful.
VVGE.2001.02.Nr.37 · ow (Art. 66 Bst. b GOG)
Petrol Station Removal Clause Upheld
This provision is cited regarding the binding nature of factual findings by the lower court, unless proven incorrect, thus relevant to the procedural aspect of the appeal's review.
VVGE.2003.04.Nr.31 · ow (Art. 66 Bst. c GOG)
Administrative Court Review of Severance Pay and Hardship Claims
Used to establish the scope of review for public law compensation claims, allowing for review of appropriateness.
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.38 · ow (Art. 66 Bst. c Ziff. 1 GOG)
Tax Appeals Commission's Unjustified Decision on Loan Certificates and Livelihood Expenses Violates Fair Hearing Rights
In conjunction with Art. 224 Abs. 3 StG, this provision limits the review of discretionary assessments by the administrative court regarding their appropriateness.
VVGE.2007.08.Nr.39 · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Neighborhood Development Plan Approval Upheld Despite Standing Challenges
This provision defines the scope of review for the administrative court, limiting it to legal violations, errors in fact-finding, and abuse of discretion, which guided the court's assessment of the lower instance's decision.
VVGE.1999.00.Anhang.I · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Cantonal Employment Law Dismissal Procedures and Compensation
Specifies the grounds for appeal to the Administrative Court, including incorrect or incomplete factual findings.
VVGE.1999.00.Anhang · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Public Employee Dismissals Under Cantonal Law
Cited as the basis for the scope of review by the administrative court.
VVGE.2005.06.Nr.30 · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Public Employee Back Pay Claim Limited by Third-Party Privacy and Justified Salary Disparities
Cited as the procedural rule defining what can be challenged in an administrative court appeal, limiting the scope of review.
VVGE.2007.08.Nr.36 · ow (Art. 66 Bst. c Ziff. 1 GOG)
Taxpayer's Failed Challenge to Discretionary Tax Assessment
In conjunction with Art. 224 para. 3 StG, it restricts the review of discretionary tax assessments by the Administrative Court.
OGVE.2014.15.29.htm · ow (Art. 66 GOG)
Flood Protection Project Upheld: Site Suitability and Public Interest Considered
Cited to define the scope of review of the Administrative Court, limiting its examination to legal violations, exceeding and abuse of discretionary power, and incorrect or incomplete determination of facts, excluding the unreasonableness of a measure.