312.0
NSGCPN
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 24 Codice penale neocastellano (CPN), del 20 novembre 1940 - Messa in pericolo da animali
3 Diritto penale - Procedura penale - Esecuzione - 31 Diritto penale - 312 Diritto penale neocastellano - CAPITOLO 2 Disposizioni speciali
Art. 24 Codice penale neocastellano (CPN), del 20 novembre 1940 - Messa in pericolo da animali · Messa in pericolo da animali
[19] Chiunque, eccitando o spaventando un animale, avrà messo in pericolo le persone, le proprietà o gli animali,
chiunque non avrà trattenuto un animale sotto la propria custodia mentre si scagliava contro persone o animali,
sarà punito con una multa. Il giudice potrà ordinare l'abbattimento dell'animale pericoloso.
← Art. 23 Codice Penale di Neuchâtel (CPN), del 20 novembre 1940 - Negligenza nella sorveglianza degli alienati
3 Diritto penale - Procedura penale - Esecuzione - 31 Diritto penale - 312 Diritto penale del Canton Neuchâtel - CAPITOLO PRIMO Disposizioni generali
Art. 25 Codice penale neocastellano (CPN), del 20 novembre 1940 - Detenzione di animali pericolosi →
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (58)
BG.2025.47 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Federal Court Declares Jurisdiction Dispute Inadmissible Due to Untimeliness
This article is referenced in the context of when federal jurisdiction might be substantiated, particularly concerning organized criminal groups, although not directly applied in the final order.
BG.2025.47 (art. 24 cpv. 2 CPP)
Federal Court Declares Jurisdiction Dispute Inadmissible Due to Untimeliness
This article is cited in relation to the possibility of federal jurisdiction, which was considered when assessing the timeliness of the appeal.
SK.2024.25 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Money Laundering: Border Cash Seizure and Drug Trafficking Links
This article lists further offenses subject to federal jurisdiction and was used to establish the court's jurisdiction.
BG.2024.16 (Art. 24 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)
Federal Court Upholds Cantonal Jurisdiction in Money Laundering Case
Discussed and implicitly rejected as the basis for mandatory federal jurisdiction in this case.
BG.2024.72 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over Complex International Fraud Case Upheld
Federal jurisdiction is justified due to the international nature and complexity of the money laundering offenses.
BG.2024.72 (art. 24 cpv. 2 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over Complex International Fraud Case Upheld
Federal jurisdiction is justified by the complex functioning and international ramifications of the economic crimes, requiring a unified federal procedure.
BG.2024.74 (art. 24 cpv. 1 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Case Upheld
Cited as the basis for federal jurisdiction due to the international nature of the money laundering acts and the collection/movement of funds abroad or through brokers in various cantons and abroad.
BG.2024.74 (art. 24 cpv. 2 CPP)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Case Upheld
Cited as a justification for federal jurisdiction due to the complexity and international ramifications of the case, requiring a unified and coordinated federal procedure.
BG.2023.35 (Art. 24 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO)
Zurich Retains Jurisdiction Over Covid-19 Fraud Case Despite Communication Lapses
Cited in relation to the transfer of jurisdiction for money laundering offenses when actions occur in multiple cantons without a clear focus.
BG.2023.35 (Art. 24 Abs. 2 StPO)
Zurich Retains Jurisdiction Over Covid-19 Fraud Case Despite Communication Lapses
Cited in relation to the transfer of jurisdiction for fraud offenses.
BG.2023.9 (Art. 24 al. 1 CPP)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Cantonal vs. Federal Authority in Cross-Border Fraud Case
Used to assess federal jurisdiction for specific serious crimes, including those committed abroad or in multiple cantons without clear predominance in one.
BG.2023.9 (Art. 24 al. 2 CPP)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Cantonal vs. Federal Authority in Cross-Border Fraud Case
Allows the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Confederation to open proceedings in certain cases, such as when no cantonal authority has initiated proceedings or a cantonal authority has requested the case be taken over.
BG.2023.18 (Art. 24 cpv. 1 lett. a CPP)
Federal vs. Provincial Jurisdiction in Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Case
This article establishes federal jurisdiction for certain offenses, including those committed predominantly abroad, which is relevant due to the international context of the alleged money laundering.
BG.2022.45 (Art. 24 Abs. 2 StPO)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office to open an investigation into certain crimes, establishing federal jurisdiction.
BG.2022.45 (Art. 24 Abs. 3 StPO)
Federal Jurisdiction Over International Fraud and Money Laundering Upheld
Cited as the provision that establishes federal jurisdiction once an investigation is opened under Art. 24 Abs. 2 StPO.