150.10
LHGLRESHaftGLResp
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 11 Legge sulla responsabilità delle collettività pubbliche e dei loro agenti (Legge sulla responsabilità) (LResp), del 29 settembre 2020 - Azione di regresso
1 Stato - Popolo - Autorità - 15 Autorità - 150 Disposizioni generali - CAPITOLO 3 Azione di regresso dell'ente pubblico
Art. 11 Legge sulla responsabilità delle collettività pubbliche e dei loro agenti (Legge sulla responsabilità) (LResp), del 29 settembre 2020 - Azione di regresso · Azione di regresso
La collettività pubblica che ha risarcito il danno ha un'azione di regresso contro l'agente responsabile che lo ha causato intenzionalmente o per grave negligenza, anche dopo la cessazione dei rapporti di servizio.
← Art. 10 Legge sulla responsabilità degli enti pubblici e dei loro agenti (Legge sulla responsabilità) (LResp), del 29 settembre 2020 - Prescrizione
1 Stato - Popolo - Autorità - 15 Autorità - 150 Disposizioni generali - CAPITOLO PRIMO Generalità
Art. 12 Legge sulla responsabilità degli enti pubblici e dei loro agenti (Legge sulla responsabilità) (LResp), del 29 settembre 2020 - Competenza →
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (20)
CACIV.2015.47 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Patient v. Public Hospital Regarding Timeliness of Administrative Claim Following Childbirth Complications
The lower court incorrectly applied this provision to dismiss the action as time-barred.
CACIV.2015.47 · ne (Art. 11 al. 3 LResp)
Patient v. Public Hospital Regarding Timeliness of Administrative Claim Following Childbirth Complications
The appeal was admitted because the lower court erred in not applying this provision, as the public entity had entered into discussions/settlement talks.
CDP.2013.196 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Public Contract Award Dispute and Preclusion Period Compliance
The court confirmed the admissibility of the administrative action based on the timely filing within the six-month period stipulated by this provision, taking into account the conciliation filing date.
CDP.2013.196 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Public Contract Award Dispute and Preclusion Period Compliance
The court used this provision to determine the deadline for filing the action after the indemnity request was contested or left without response.
CDP.2013.196 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Public Contract Award Dispute and Preclusion Period Compliance
This article was used to establish that the filing before the Regional Court occurred within the six-month deadline.
CDP.2015.316 · ne (art. 11 al. 1 let. a [LResp])
Officer Termination Annulled for Procedural Due Process Violations; Damages Claim Remitted.
Cited as the basis for declining jurisdiction over the moral damages claim and transferring it to the competent department.
CDP.2015.316 · ne (art. 11 al. 2 [LResp])
Officer Termination Annulled for Procedural Due Process Violations; Damages Claim Remitted.
Cited in relation to the procedural deadlines for pursuing the damages claim after departmental inaction.
CDP.2006.426 · ne (art. 11 al. 1 let. b LResp)
Wrongful Termination Appeal Receivable; Mobbing and Certificate Claims Inadmissible in Administrative Action
Cited as the basis for transmitting the claim for moral damages to the defendant (Hôpital neuchâtelois) as the competent authority.
CDP.2015.131 · ne (art. 11 al. 1 let. b [LResp])
Lifeguard Dismissal Overturned Due to Procedural Delay
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prerequisite claim for moral damages that must be addressed to the communal council.
CDP.2015.131 · ne (art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Lifeguard Dismissal Overturned Due to Procedural Delay
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadline for pursuing the action if the council contests the claim for moral damages.
CDP.2014.154 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Claimant v. Public Hospital Regarding Medical Malpractice and Statutory Time Limit for Suit
The action was declared inadmissible because it was filed after the six-month deadline stipulated by this provision following the expiry of the three-month response period from the initial claim.
CDP.2011.292 · ne (Art. 11 al. 2 LResp)
Hospital Liability for Medical Negligence and Prescription Period for Damages
The court declared the action admissible because it was introduced within the six-month period provided by this article, following the State's objection to the claim.
CDP.2012.381 · ne (Art. 11 al. 1 let. a LResp)
Bankruptcy Annulment and Liability for Restaurant Closure Damages
Discussed in relation to the requirement for a prior claim, implicitly considered satisfied for admissibility purposes.
TA.2008.174 · ne (art. 11 al.2 [LResp](http://rsn.ne.ch/ajour_83/dati/f/s/15010.htm))
Wrongful Detention Compensation Claim Admissibility Despite Statute of Limitations Dispute
This provision was central to determining the admissibility of the action by setting the time limit for filing suit after the public entity's position (or lack thereof) on the compensation claim.
TA.2004.141 · ne (art. 11 al.2 LResp)
Appeal Against Denial of Compensation for Damage Caused by Investigating Judge Dismissed as Inadmissible
Cited in relation to the required procedure (action within six months) when the claim is contested or not answered, which reinforces the inadmissibility finding.