101
V-NBNE
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 8 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 - Uguaglianza e divieto di discriminazioni
1 Stato - Popolo - Autorità - 10 Costituzione e altri atti fondamentali - Titolo II - Capitolo primo Diritti fondamentali
Art. 8 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 - Uguaglianza e divieto di discriminazioni · Uguaglianza e divieto di discriminazioni
1 L'uguaglianza di diritto è garantita. Nessuno deve subire discriminazione, in particolare a causa della sua origine, della sua etnia, del suo colore, del suo sesso, della sua lingua, della sua condizione sociale, del suo stile di vita, delle sue convinzioni religiose, filosofiche o politiche o a causa di una disabilità fisica, mentale o psichica.
2. La donna e l'uomo sono uguali di fronte alla legge. Hanno diritto in particolare alla stessa formazione, a un salario uguale per un lavoro di valore uguale, nonché a un accesso uguale alla funzione pubblica.
← Art. 7 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 - Dignità umana
1 Stato - Popolo - Autorità - 10 Costituzione e altri atti fondamentali - Titolo primo - Disposizioni generali
Art. 9 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 →
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (26)
CDP.2025.125 · ne (art. 8 al. 2 Cst. féd.)
Portuguese National Residence Status and Deportation Following Social Assistance Dependency
Used in the reasoning concerning the final appeal's rejection regarding potential discrimination based on disability.
CDP.2024.36 · ne (art. 8 al. 2 Cst. féd.)
Company Bathroom Clock-In Requirement Annulled
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on sex.
CDP.2024.36 · ne (art. 8 al. 3 Cst. féd.)
Company Bathroom Clock-In Requirement Annulled
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prohibition of discrimination between men and women.
ARMC.2023.31 · ne (Art. 8 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Employee v. Public Hospital Regarding Salary Transposition and Back Pay
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the principle of equality of treatment regarding differential salary correction, though the rejection is based on other grounds in the dispositive.
CPEN.2022.9 · ne (Art. 8 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Public Hospital Employee Salary Inequality Claim Rejection
This article was the core legal basis against which the alleged unequal treatment in salary correction timing was measured (although the claim based on it for retroactive payment was rejected).
CDP.2020.292 · ne (Art. 8 Cst. féd.)
Sports Club RHT Application Appeal on Enterprise Status and Remand for New Consideration
Cited in the context of examining the claim of violation of the principle of equal treatment, although the claim was ultimately rejected, the court examined the principle.
CDP.2018.40 · ne (art. 8 Cst. féd.)
Property Owner v. State Council Regarding Building Permit Denial in Water Protection Zone
Mentioned in the reasoning concerning the violation of the principle of equal treatment, but not cited in the dispositive.
CDP.2016.410 · ne (Art. 8 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Hospital Employee Salary Transposition Unequal Treatment Claim and Retroactive Pay Denial
Cited in the reasoning that leads to the rejection of the claim concerning retrospective salary payments based on general equality principle.
CDP.2016.411 · ne (Art. 8 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Employee Salary Step Placement Dispute Post-Collective Bargaining Agreement
Cited in the reasoning section that leads to the rejection of the demand, specifically concerning the principle of equality in treatment of salary corrections.
CDP.2016.412 · ne (Art. 8 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Public Hospital Salary Transposition Equal Treatment Claim Denial
Used to reject the applicant's claim that she should receive the same retroactive treatment as colleagues who initiated the previous lawsuit, as the general principle of equality does not grant a subjective right to retroactive equal remuneration.
CDP.2014.199 · ne (Art. 8 al. 2 Cst. féd.)
Student Disability Accommodation Failure Leading to Admission Denial Annulment
The court relied on this constitutional provision concerning the prohibition of discrimination based on disability when annulling the contested decision, which was based on a failure to guarantee elementary equality of opportunity.
CDP.2013.84 · ne (Art. 8 al. 1 Cst.)
Employee Retroactive Salary Claim Against State Council Decision
The obligation for the public employer to remunerate the same work with the same salary was invoked and discussed by the court in section 4.b.
CDP.2009.125 · ne (art. 8 Cst. neuchâteloise)
Employee Seniority Transposition and Salary Classification Dispute
Mentioned as the cantonal equivalent of the federal equality principle in the context of salary transposition claims.
CDP.2009.125 · ne (art. 8 al. 1 [Cst. féd.])
Employee Seniority Transposition and Salary Classification Dispute
Violation of this principle is the basis for finding the inequality of treatment in salary transposition.
CDP.2012.109 · ne (art. 8 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Cantonal Police Salary Placement Dispute After Rejoining Force
Cited as the constitutional principle regarding the prohibition of unequal treatment in employment, though the claim based on it was rejected.