101
V-NBNE
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 29 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 - Garanzie di procedura giudiziaria
1 Stato - Popolo - Autorità - 10 Costituzione e altri atti fondamentali - Titolo II - Capitolo primo Diritti fondamentali
Art. 29 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 - Garanzie di procedura giudiziaria · Garanzie di procedura giudiziaria
Ogni persona la cui causa deve essere trattata in una procedura giudiziaria ha diritto a che questa causa sia portata davanti a un tribunale stabilito per legge, competente, indipendente e imparziale. Fatte salve le eccezioni stabilite dalla legge, l'udienza e la pronuncia del giudizio sono pubbliche.
← Art. 28 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 - Garanzie generali di procedura
1 Stato - Popolo - Autorità - 10 Costituzione e altri atti fondamentali - Titolo primo - Disposizioni generali
Art. 30 Costituzione della Repubblica e Cantone di Neuchâtel (Cost. NE), del 24 settembre 2000 →
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (163)
ARMP.2025.74 · ne (Art. 29 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Prosecutor's Inaction on Theft Complaints Subject to Mooted Delay Claim
Cited as one of the constitutional guarantees ensuring the right to a decision within a reasonable time, relevant to the appeal concerning denial of justice.
CPEN.2024.76 · ne (Art. 29 al. 1 Cst.)
Hip Prosthesis Intervention Appeal Dismissed in Conciliation Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of speed in relation to the suspension request.
ARMP.2025.22 · ne (art. 29 al. 3 Cst. féd.)
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention for Drug Trafficking and Money Laundering
Cited in the reasoning regarding the maintenance of legal aid, which is also mentioned regarding the attorney's fee reimbursement.
CACIV.2024.78 · ne (Art. 29 al. 1 et 2 Cst. féd.)
Partner Removal Dispute and Procedural Oversight in Provisional Measures
Cited as the basis for finding a violation of the right to be heard due to the omission to rule on a subsidiary conclusion.
ARMP.2024.175 · ne (art. 29 al. 3 Cst. féd.)
Appeal of Dismissal for Unlawful Recording Upheld Due to Self-Defense Justification
Cited in the reasoning concerning the ineligibility for legal aid due to the lack of prospect of success, supporting order point 2.
ARMP.2024.188 · ne (Art. 29 al. 2 Cst. féd.)
Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Prostitution Encouragement Charges Upheld
Cited in relation to the alleged violation of the right to be heard.
ARMP.2024.191 · ne (art. 29 al. 3 Cst. féd.)
Detention Pending Trial Based on Disputed Age
Cited in the reasoning (cons. 9.1) regarding the right not to be compensated for useless steps, but not in the dispositive, therefore excluded.
CACIV.2024.69 · ne (art. 29 al. 1 Cst. féd.)
Employer v. Former Worker: Tort Claim vs. Mandatory Labor Conciliation
Cited in the context of concluding that declaring the claim inadmissible due to a procedural defect constituted excessive formalism, which is prohibited.
ARMP.2024.140 · ne (Art. 29 al. 2 Cst. féd.)
Prosecutor's Decision to Admit Consolidated Police Reports Upheld Against Challenge of Joint Drafting and Defense Rights
Used as the basis for denying the appellant legal aid for the appeal proceedings because the appeal lacked any chance of success.
CMPEA.2024.25 · ne (Art. 29 al. 2 Cst. féd.)
Curator Account Approval Annulment Due to Insufficient Motivation and Denial of Access to Verification Report
Violation du droit d'être entendu, impliquant l'obligation pour l'autorité de motiver sa décision, ce qui est le fondement de l'annulation de la décision attaquée.
CDP.2024.142 · ne (Art. 29 al. 2 Cst. féd.)
Withdrawal of Nurse's Practice Authorization for Professional Misconduct and Operating Unregistered Institution
Cited in the reasoning, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders, to define the right to be heard, thus this is excluded based on the rules.
CDP.2024.36 · ne (art. 29 al. 2 Cst.)
Company Bathroom Clock-In Requirement Annulled
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appellant's argument of violation of the right to be heard, which was considered together with the merits.
ARMP.2024.71 · ne (Art. 29 Cst.)
Property Co-Owners v. Lower Court on Expert Fee Advance and Right to be Heard
Cited in the reasoning regarding the constitutional basis for the right to be heard, which influenced the decision to annul the prior ruling.
CACIV.2024.9 · ne (Art. 29 al. 3 Cst. féd.)
Cohabitant's Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Proof of Financial Contributions to Joint Assets
Cited alongside Art. 117 let. b CPC as a legal basis for denying legal aid due to lack of chances of success.
CMPEA.2024.19 · ne (Art. 29 al. 3 Cst.)
Appeal Granted: Incomplete Financial Assessment in Legal Aid Denial for Partner's Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization
This constitutional provision underpins the right to legal aid which the court ultimately granted.