801.110 KRVOOPTC

CH-GR

Art. 16 Ordinanza sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (OPTC) - Avvio

Pianificazione locale - Procedura del piano di quartiere

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (85 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 16 OPTC · Avvio

1. La Sovrastanza comunale rende nota l'intenzione di avviare la pianificazione di quartiere, indicando lo scopo della pianificazione, e l'esecuzione di un'eventuale ricomposizione particellare o rettifica dei confini nell'organo di pubblicazione ufficiale del comune. Al contempo espone pubblicamente il piano con la prevista delimitazione dell'area di pianificazione per 30 giorni nel comune. Gli interessati devono essere informati per iscritto prima dell'esposizione.

2. Durante l'esposizione pubblica può essere presentata opposizione alla Sovrastanza comunale contro il previsto avvio della procedura e la delimitazione dell'area di pianificazione. Per la legittimazione all'opposizione fanno stato gli stessi presupposti che fanno stato per il ricorso di pianificazione territoriale al Governo. Nel corso dell'ulteriore procedura non possono più essere sollevate obiezioni contro la procedura in sé e l'area di pianificazione.

3. L'esposizione pubblica va ripetuta qualora la prevista area di pianificazione venga modificata in seguito a opposizioni. Qualora le modifiche concernano soltanto singoli interessati, al posto di una nuova esposizione pubblica, deve essere loro data facoltà di presentare opposizione entro 30 giorni.

4. Una volta conclusa la procedura d'esposizione, la Sovrastanza comunale emana il decreto d'avvio di procedura, lo notifica agli interessati e ad eventuali opponenti e lo porta a conoscenza del Servizio.

← Art. 15 OPTC Ordinanza sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (OPTC) - Dipartimento competente, Servizio Art. 17 OPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (20)

VR3 2023 108 · gr (Art. 16 KRVO)

Municipal Green Zone Planning for Underground Parking Upheld Against Heritage Concerns

The court notes that in this phase of the proceedings (initiation of the 'Quartierplan'), only procedural objections and objections regarding the definition of the planning area can be raised, as stipulated by this article.

PVG 2021 20 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Administrative Cost Imposition on Unsuccessful Neighborhood Plan Objectors

Cited as the procedural basis for objectors whose costs were ruled upon in the dispositive.

PVG 2021 20 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 Satz 1 KRVO)

Administrative Cost Imposition on Unsuccessful Neighborhood Plan Objectors

Cited in connection with Art. 96 Abs. 2 KRG to specify which objectors may be charged costs (those filing an objection according to this provision).

R 2021 85 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 Satz 1 KRVO)

Municipal Cost Imposition in Neighborhood Plan Objection Proceedings

Cited in the reasoning to establish the context of the objection which led to the annulled cost order.

PVG 2020 21 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Municipality's Discretion in Choosing Infrastructure Regulation Procedure

Used to dismiss the challenge regarding the initiation of the planning procedure as time-barred.

R 2016 82 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Appeal Against Neighborhood Plan Initiation Due to Flawed Infrastructure Planning

Cited in the reasoning to explain that only objections concerning the procedure itself and the delimitation of the planning area could be raised at this stage.

R 2016 82 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Appeal Against Neighborhood Plan Initiation Due to Flawed Infrastructure Planning

Cited to determine that the decision under appeal was the only eligible object for the administrative court proceeding, as it was the decision regarding the initiation phase of the zoning plan.

R 2015 94 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Neighborhood Plan Revision and FAR Increase

Cited to confirm that the initiation decision was procedurally sound and subject to objection during the public display period.

R 2015 94 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Neighborhood Plan Revision and FAR Increase

The initiation of the revision was done under this provision, which was confirmed to be procedurally correct.

R 2015 51 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 1 KRVO)

Administrative Court Upholds Zoning Revision Based on Changed Parking Feasibility

Cited to confirm that the municipality correctly followed the procedural steps for initiating a zoning plan procedure, including public notice and consulting affected parties.

R 2015 51 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Administrative Court Upholds Zoning Revision Based on Changed Parking Feasibility

Cited to confirm that the municipality correctly ruled on the objections received regarding the initiation of the procedure.

R 2014 94 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 1 und 2 KRVO)

Administrative Court Upholds Neighborhood Development Plan Approval Over Access Road Dispute

Used to justify the inadmissibility of raising objections regarding the definition of the development area perimeter, as this should have been done during the initiation phase.

R 2012 61 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Property Owners Challenge Mandatory Neighborhood Plan Initiation

Cited to explain why objections against the planning area boundaries cannot be raised at this stage of the appeal against the initiation decision (point 3.a).

R 2012 78 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Owner Lacks Standing to Appeal Zoning Cost Assessment After Payment Deferral

Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's decision to initiate the detailed planning procedure, but it is not explicitly used in the final orders (dispositive).

PVG 2011 17 · gr (Art. 16 KRVO)

Municipal Plan Revision Invalid Due to Lack of Preliminary Resolution

This article was referenced as detailing the initiation procedure that was allegedly omitted.