801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 96 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Spese di procedura

Diritto edilizio formale - Spese di procedura

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 96 LPTC · Spese di procedura

1. I comuni riscuotono tasse per le loro spese derivanti dalla procedura di rilascio della licenza edilizia e da altre procedure di polizia edilizia. Devono essere inoltre rimborsate al comune spese per prestazioni di terzi come perizie tecniche, consulenze, nonché spese del registro fondiario.

2. Deve assumersi le spese chi le ha provocate con domande di ogni tipo o con il suo comportamento. Le spese risultanti dall'evasione di opposizioni vanno a carico dell'opponente, se l'opposizione è palesemente inammissibile o palesemente infondata. In tal caso gli opponenti possono inoltre venire obbligati a versare agli istanti ripetibili adeguate.

3. I comuni disciplinano il computo e la riscossione di tasse in un'ordinanza sulle tasse.

4. Per decisioni EFZ, nonché per decisioni di multa e di ripristino concernenti progetti di costruzione al di fuori delle zone edificabili l'autorità EFZ riscuote, dagli istanti rispettivamente dalle parti, tasse costituite da una tassa di Stato fino a 3000 franchi, da una tassa di cancelleria e dal rimborso di eventuali spese in contanti. In presenza di circostanze straordinarie la tassa di Stato può essere aumentata adeguatamente.

5. Restano riservate le tasse per autorizzazioni supplementari ed esami d'impatto ambientale conformemente alla rispettiva legislazione speciale.

← Art. 95 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 97 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (124)

VR3 2024 46 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 1, Abs. 2 Satz 1 KRG)

Municipality's Executive Action to Complete Unfinished Facade Upheld

Used as a basis, in conjunction with GebG articles, for charging the costs incurred by the municipality in the administrative procedure.

VR3 2024 46 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 3 KRG)

Municipality's Executive Action to Complete Unfinished Facade Upheld

Used as a basis, in conjunction with GebG articles, for charging the costs incurred by the municipality in the administrative procedure.

VR3 2023 67 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 1 KRG)

Municipality Development Zone Designation and Permit Suspension Appeal

Cited as the legal basis for municipalities to levy fees for their expenditure in building permit procedures and external services like legal advice.

VR3 2023 67 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 2 KRG)

Municipality Development Zone Designation and Permit Suspension Appeal

Cited to confirm the polluter pays principle regarding the imposition of costs.

VR3 2023 67 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 3 KRG)

Municipality Development Zone Designation and Permit Suspension Appeal

Cited in relation to the requirement for the municipality to regulate the assessment and levying of fees in a specific fee ordinance.

VR3 2025 9 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 1 und 3 KRG)

Cost Apportionment Following Supreme Court Remand on Permit Revocation

Cited in reasoning for referring the case back to the local authorities regarding the fees for the building permit procedure.

VR3 2025 9 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 4 KRG)

Cost Apportionment Following Supreme Court Remand on Permit Revocation

Cited in reasoning for referring the case back to the local authorities regarding the fees for the building permit appeal procedure.

VR3 2024 3 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 4 KRG)

Farm Secondary Use Zoning Appeal on Procedural Grounds

Cited in the original decision (point 7) for imposing costs on the applicant (complainant), which was annulled in the final orders (point 2).

R 2024 7 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed for Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Bathroom

Cited to confirm the municipality's authority to charge fees for building permit proceedings.

R 2024 7 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 2 Satz 1 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed for Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Bathroom

Cited to justify imposing costs on the appellant as the party causing the expenditure.

R 2024 4 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed on Primary Residence Obligation Fulfillment

The imposition of administrative fees and costs for external legal consultation on the appellants was confirmed based on this article and the municipal fee schedule.

R 2023 43 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 1 und 2 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Demolition Order for Unauthorized Building Construction

This article was mentioned as the legal basis for potentially charging the appellant for having plans drawn up by a third party as part of the procedure to clarify the material legal situation.

R 2022 103 · gr (Art. 96 KRG)

Appeal Against Municipal Fine and Path Prohibition Following Unauthorized Construction

Cited by the lower court regarding the basis for imposing procedural costs, which the higher court subsequently recalculated.

R 2022 72 · gr (Art. 96 cpv. 1 LPTC)

Municipal Restoration Costs Challenge

Cited in the Municipal decision (point 11) regarding the obligation to reimburse the municipality for third-party expenses, and implicitly used in reasoning 5.4.

R 2020 105 · gr (Art. 96 Abs. 1 und 3 KRG)

Appeal Against Telecommunications Mast Permit: Setback Regulations and Environmental Review

Cited by the lower court as the basis for charging costs in the prior administrative appeal procedure, which the Administrative Court then overturned due to lack of sufficient legal basis (Erw. 7.3).