801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 94 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Ripristino dello stato di legalità

Diritto edilizio formale - Competenza, ripristino, pena

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 94 LPTC · Ripristino dello stato di legalità

1. Stati materialmente illegali sono da eliminare su ordine dell'autorità competente, indipendentemente dal fatto che in seguito alla loro produzione sia stata eseguita una procedura di contravvenzione.

2. Il rilascio e l'attuazione di decisioni di ripristino competono all'autorità edilizia comunale. In caso di stati illegali al di fuori delle zone edificabili l'autorità EFZ adotta le misure necessarie, qualora l'autorità edilizia comunale rimanga inattiva nonostante l'invito del Cantone. Le spese risultanti al Cantone vengono ascritte a carico del comune, nella misura in cui esse non possono venire addebitate alle persone responsabili o se sono irrecuperabili.

3. L'obbligo del ripristino dello stato legale tocca sia ai proprietari che alle persone che hanno provocato lo stato illegale. Se coloro che sono tenuti al ripristino in base ad una decisione di ripristino cresciuta in giudicato non assolvono agli obblighi entro il termine stabilito, in seguito a comminatoria l'autorità competente fa eseguire le necessarie misure da terzi a spese degli inadempienti.

4. Se l'autorità competente, per motivi di proporzionalità o di buona fede, deve parzialmente o totalmente prescindere dall'ordinare provvedimenti di ripristino, emana una decisione che tollera lo stato illegale (decisione di tolleranza).

← Art. 93 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 95 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (124)

VR3 2023 75 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 1 KRG)

Property Owner Appeal Against Municipal Order to Remove Basement Fixtures

Cited implicitly as the basis for upholding the non-removal of kitchen facilities, based on the material non-conformity established under Art. 90 BauG, where the 30-year prescription period was deemed elapsed for the bathroom facilities.

VR3 2023 75 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 4 KRG)

Property Owner Appeal Against Municipal Order to Remove Basement Fixtures

Used to justify partially accepting the appeal and revoking the removal order for bathroom facilities and furniture due to lack of proportionality after the prescription period.

VR3 2021 35 · gr (Art. 94 KRG)

Alpine Hut Window Design Dispute and Restoration Order

Cited as the basis for the ordered measures to restore the legal condition (Wiederherstellungsmassnahmen).

VR3 2021 36 · gr (Art. 94 KRG)

Municipal Restoration Order Upheld Against Unauthorized Mountain Hut Reconstruction

Cited as the legal basis for the ordered restoration measures (Wiederherstellungsmassnahmen).

VR3 2024 46 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 1 und 2 KRG)

Municipality's Executive Action to Complete Unfinished Facade Upheld

The court upheld the decision to proceed with the remedial action based on this article, as the initial violation was established.

VR3 2024 46 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 4 KRG)

Municipality's Executive Action to Complete Unfinished Facade Upheld

Used in the reasoning to explain the proportionality test (which ultimately did not lead to cancelling the remedial action).

VR3 2024 3 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 2 KRG)

Farm Secondary Use Zoning Appeal on Procedural Grounds

Cited in the original decision (point 5) regarding the instruction to initiate proceedings for restoration of the legal status, which was annulled in the final orders (point 2).

R 2024 33 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 3 KRG)

Municipal Order Appeal on Unauthorized Attic Use and Fine

Cited in the first instance decision (Dispositive No. 5) regarding the municipality's right to proceed with enforcement measures at the owner's expense if the deadline for restoration expires.

R 2024 33 · gr (Art. 94 KRG)

Municipal Order Appeal on Unauthorized Attic Use and Fine

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 4) as the basis for ordering the elimination of materially non-compliant situations (restoration).

R 2024 34 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 3 KRG)

Municipal Order on Unlawful Attic Studio Use Upheld, Forfeiture of Gains Partially Annulled

Cited in the dispositive of the initial administrative decision (point 5) regarding the threat of executing restoration measures at the expense of the property owner if the deadline is missed.

R 2023 35 · gr (Art. 94 KRG)

Pergola Setback and Building Permit Classification Appeal

Mentioned as the basis for issuing a restoration order, which the court declined to rule on in this appeal procedure.

R 2023 41 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 2 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Unlawful Structures in Agricultural Zone; Restoration Ordered

Cited in the administrative decision (Ziff. 3) to instruct the municipality to initiate restoration proceedings for non-compliant structures.

R 2023 32 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 3 KRG)

Complainants v. Municipality regarding Unpermitted Embankment Removal Order

The responsibility for restoration lies with the appellants as they caused the illegal condition.

R 2023 32 · gr (Art. 94 KRG)

Complainants v. Municipality regarding Unpermitted Embankment Removal Order

The content of the regulation concerning the obligation to eliminate materially non-compliant situations was applied.

R 2023 43 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Demolition Order for Unauthorized Building Construction

The court implicitly confirmed that the existing construction constituted a non-compliant situation that justified the restoration order, as the appeal against the restoration order based on this provision was dismissed.