801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 93 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Competenza, responsabilità

Diritto edilizio formale - Competenza, ripristino, pena

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 93 LPTC · Competenza, responsabilità

1. Per l'osservanza delle prescrizioni legali, la conformità degli edifici ed impianti realizzati con i piani autorizzati e le modine, nonché per il rispetto delle disposizioni accessorie sono competenti i committenti, i proprietari, altre persone autorizzate e le persone incaricate della progettazione e dell'esecuzione di progetti di costruzione.

2. Autorizzando e controllando edifici ed impianti, il Cantone ed i comuni non assumono alcuna responsabilità per la costruzione, la stabilità, l'idoneità del materiale e la sicurezza degli edifici ed impianti realizzati.

← Art. 92 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 94 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (17)

VR3 2024 67 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Municipality v. Appellant: Building Ban Violation and Penalty Justification

The court confirmed that the appellant qualified as a responsible person under this provision for the construction works.

R 2024 33 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Municipal Order Appeal on Unauthorized Attic Use and Fine

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 8.2) to establish who is responsible for non-compliant building situations (e.g., property owner).

R 2024 34 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Municipal Order on Unlawful Attic Studio Use Upheld, Forfeiture of Gains Partially Annulled

Cited in the dispositive of the initial administrative decision (point 1, case R 24 33) to annul the confiscation of illicit profit and refer the matter back for a new decision.

R 2023 32 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Complainants v. Municipality regarding Unpermitted Embankment Removal Order

Applied to establish the implicit obligation of the current holder of the leasehold right to tolerate the restoration works.

R 2023 43 · gr (Art. 93 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Demolition Order for Unauthorized Building Construction

This article was cited when concluding that the appellant grossly failed to meet her co-operation obligations regarding the submission of required documents.

R 2022 103 · gr (Art. 93 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Municipal Fine and Path Prohibition Following Unauthorized Construction

Cited as the basis for holding the appellant responsible for compliance with building regulations and plans, justifying the fine.

R 2019 37 · gr (Art. 93 Abs. 2 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Agricultural Building Renovation Permit Restrictions

Cited implicitly when the court notes that the cantons and municipalities assume no liability for construction quality through the permit and control process, even though this article is used in reasoning rather than dispositive.

R 2016 81 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Appeal Against Building Regulation Fines Overturned Due to Reliance on Favorable Inspections

Mentioned by the lower authority in the reasoning why the appellants were considered liable.

R 2015 58 · gr (Art. 93 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Demolition Order for Building Code Violations and Fines

Cited as the basis for the responsibility of the building owner regarding compliance with plans, relevant to the analysis of fault for the fine.

R 2014 71 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Construction Without Permit Upheld

Cited as the basis for the appellant's responsibility as the property owner for observing legal provisions, justifying the finding of fault.

R 2015 20 · gr (Art. 93 Abs. 1 KRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Unlawful Construction and Administrative Enforcement

Used to justify upholding the opening of the penalty procedure against the appellant, as the owner/builder is responsible for compliance with permits.

R 2013 55 · gr (Art. 93 Abs. 1 KRG)

Administrative Fine for Unpermitted Renovation Work Upheld in Part

Cited in the reasoning to establish the joint liability of the owner and the person responsible for planning and execution.

R 2013 56 · gr (Art. 93 Abs. 1 KRG)

Property Owner Fined for Unpermitted Renovation Despite Material Permissibility

Mentioned as the basis for the owner's liability for building law violations, relevant to the assessment of guilt.

PVG 2011 24 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Architect's Building Penalty Upheld Despite Procedural Objections

Cited as one of the provisions defining the responsibility for adhering to legal regulations in construction projects, leading to the finding of liability.

R 2010 124 · gr (Art. 93 KRG)

Municipal Order Upheld: Illegal Excavation Material, Fine, and Confiscation

Cited as the basis for identifying the persons responsible for the violation, who are jointly and severally liable for the fine.