801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 92 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Procedura per il rilascio della licenza edilizia

Diritto edilizio formale - Autorizzazioni

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 92 LPTC · Procedura per il rilascio della licenza edilizia

1. Domande di costruzione, domande EFZ e domande per autorizzazioni supplementari che necessitano di coordinamento devono essere inoltrate al comune di ubicazione.

2. I comuni si occupano della procedura di esposizione. Durante l'esposizione pubblica è possibile sollevare opposizione scritta e motivata presso il comune. Per la legittimazione ad opporsi valgono per analogia le condizioni per il ricorso di pianificazione al Governo.

3. Il Governo disciplina mediante ordinanza la procedura ordinaria per il rilascio della licenza edilizia e la procedura EFZ. Il Governo stabilisce una procedura semplificata per il rilascio della licenza edilizia per progetti di costruzione che concernono solo insignificanti interessi pubblici e privati.

3bis. Il Governo rende possibile la procedura elettronica per il rilascio della licenza edilizia ed emana le prescrizioni necessarie a tal fine mediante ordinanza.

4. Nella legge edilizia i comuni emanano all'occorrenza disposizioni complementari. Essi possono introdurre un obbligo di annuncio e regolare le corrispondenti modalità.

← Art. 91 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 93 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)

PVG 2024 9 · gr (Art. 92 KRG)

Solar Tracker Boundary Distance Dispute

Cited in the operative part as the basis for requiring an ordinary building permit procedure for the free-standing solar tracker.

PVG 2023 11 · gr (Art. 92 KRG)

Building Permit Coordination with Geothermal Heat Pump Water Protection Permit

Cited in the reasoning to determine that the municipality incorrectly handled the building permit concerning coordination requirements for supplementary permits.

PVG 2017 20 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 2 KRG)

Objection Deadline Extension in Building Permit Procedure

The court determined that the deadline for filing an objection under this article is a deadline for forfeiture, which was the central issue regarding the admissibility of the supplementary objection.

R 2014 31 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 2 KRG)

Building Permit Revocation Denial Due to Failure to Timely Object

Mentioned in the lower court's reasoning (and discussed by the court) as the provision under which the appellant should have raised her substantive objections during the initial appeal period.

R 2013 133 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 2 KRG)

Inn Renovation Permit Appeal Regarding Setback Violations

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the objection procedure is a formal procedure equivalent to an appeal.

R 2011 68 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 2 KRG)

Retirement Center Expansion Permit Upheld Against Building Code Objections

Cited in reasoning to define the formal procedure for raising an objection to a building application.

PVG 2009 27 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 1 KRG)

Coordination of Related Building Permit Procedures

Cited as part of the basis for the finding that the municipality failed to ensure coordination between the building permit procedure and the supplementary permit procedure.

R 2009 17 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Construction Permit Due to Failure to Coordinate Permits

Cited as part of the legal framework whose violation led to the annulment of the decisions.

R 2009 17 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Construction Permit Due to Failure to Coordinate Permits

Cited as the basis for requiring coordination in this case.

R 2009 17 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 2 KRG)

Appeal Against Construction Permit Due to Failure to Coordinate Permits

Cited as part of the legal framework whose violation led to the annulment of the decisions.

R 2009 17 · gr (Art. 92 KRG)

Appeal Against Construction Permit Due to Failure to Coordinate Permits

Cited as part of the legal framework whose violation led to the annulment of the decisions.

R 2006 110 · gr (Art. 92 Abs. 1 und 2 KRG)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Cellular Mast Due to Unrepublished Substantial Project Modifications

Cited in the final order (Order 1) as the basis for remitting the matter to the municipality for a proper building permit procedure.