801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 89 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Presupposti per l'autorizzazione

Diritto edilizio formale - Autorizzazioni

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 89 LPTC · Presupposti per l'autorizzazione

1. Progetti di costruzione e destinazioni ad altro scopo vengono autorizzati, se vengono osservate tutte le prescrizioni del diritto comunale, cantonale e federale.

2. Le domande di costruzione vengono giudicate in base al diritto vigente al momento della decisione.

3. Se il committente non è proprietario del terreno edificabile, la domanda di costruzione va controfirmata dal proprietario. Se questo non è proprietario del terreno necessario per l'urbanizzazione, la licenza edilizia viene rilasciata soltanto se i necessari diritti per l'urbanizzazione del progetto di costruzione sono dimostrati nella domanda di costruzione.

← Art. 88 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 90 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (33)

VR3 2024 89 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection to Building Permit for Garden Shed

Cited as the provision requiring compliance with forest setback rules (Art. 29 f. KWaG i.V.m. Art. 78 Abs. 3 KRG) as a condition for issuing a building permit, justifying the remand.

VR3 2024 89 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection to Building Permit for Garden Shed

This provision is cited as the basis for requiring compliance with forest setback regulations, a prerequisite for issuing a building permit, which necessitates the remand for an ordinary procedure.

R 2024 7 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed for Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Bathroom

Cited as the requirement for granting building permits, which was not met by the appellant's project.

R 2024 31 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Municipal Denial of Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Habitation Upheld

Cited in the reasoning (E.4.1, E.4.4) as the requirement for granting building permits, establishing compliance with all legal provisions.

R 2021 74 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Barn Rebuilding Permit Upheld Due to Expired Heritage Rights and Aesthetic Non-Compliance

The provision is the main ground for annulling the building permit because the building project was found not to be compliant with KRG requirements.

R 2022 47 · gr (art. 89 cpv. 3 LPTC)

Appeal Against Municipal Decree for Retrospective Building Application and Setback Violations

Cited to explain why the submission of May 2021 did not constitute a correct subsequent building application, as it lacked the co-signature of the property owner.

V 2022 3 · gr (Art. 89 KRG)

Citizen Initiative on 5G Rejected as Preempted by Federal and Cantonal Law

Cited in the reasoning regarding the authority granting the building permit.

R 2022 1 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Solar Installation Permit Denial Upheld Despite Procedural Defect

Cited to state the condition under which building projects must be approved (compliance with communal, cantonal, and federal law).

R 2019 87 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Mobile Communication Antenna Permit Due to Flawed Environmental Assessment of Radiation Impact

Basis for the refusal of the building permit, requiring compliance with all federal, cantonal, and communal laws.

PVG 2021 14 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 2 KRG)

Construction Permit Extension Deadline Dispute

Cited as an analogy to determine which version of Art. 91 KRG was applicable, but not explicitly in the dispositive.

R 2021 9 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 2 KRG)

Appeal Against Building Permit: Jurisdiction Over Parking vs. Water/Sewage Fees

Used to determine that the law applicable to the appeal (especially regarding fees) was the law in force at the time the contested decision was issued (i.e., law of the former municipality B._____).

R 2020 3 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 1 KRG)

Municipality v. Property Owner: Unauthorized Patio Roof Setback Violation

Cited to dismiss the argument that a structure violating setback rules could be legalized by hiding it behind a fence, as all legal provisions must be respected for a permit to be granted.

R 2020 83 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 3 KRG)

Municipality Denies Building Permit for Access Road Renovation Subject to Existing Right-of-Way Servitude

The court referenced this provision in its reasoning regarding the requirement to prove necessary rights for development over third-party land, which justifies annulling the denial of the building permit part.

R 2019 22 · gr (Art. 89 Abs. 3 Satz 2 KRG)

Objectors v. Municipality (Building Permit Demolition and Construction)

This provision requiring proof of necessary rights for access was cited in the context of the sufficient access ruling.

R 2018 57 · gr (art. 89 cpv. 2 LPTC)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Three Single-Family Homes Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicable law (at the time of the first instance decision) for judging building applications.