801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 87 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Permesso EFZ, autorità EFZ

Diritto edilizio formale - Autorizzazioni

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 87 LPTC · Permesso EFZ, autorità EFZ

1. Edifici ed impianti al di fuori delle zone edificabili (EFZ) richiedono, oltre alla licenza edilizia, un permesso cantonale (permesso EFZ).

2. La competenza per decisioni su progetti di costruzione al di fuori delle zone edificabili spetta al Dipartimento (autorità EFZ). Tramite ordinanza il Governo può delegare interamente o parzialmente la competenza ad un'altra autorità cantonale.

3. L'autorità edilizia comunale trasmette al Servizio, con una domanda motivata di rilascio del permesso EFZ, le domande per progetti di costruzione al di fuori delle zone edificabili (domanda EFZ), per i quali ritiene soddisfatti i presupposti per una licenza edilizia ed un permesso EFZ. Altrimenti respinge la domanda.

4. Se l'autorità EFZ rilascia il permesso EFZ, ciò viene comunicato dall'autorità edilizia comunale contemporaneamente al rilascio della licenza edilizia. In tal caso la licenza edilizia può essere impugnata direttamente al Tribunale d'appello a prescindere da eventuali rimedi giuridici comunali.

5. Se l'autorità EFZ rifiuta il permesso EFZ, comunica la decisione negativa EFZ direttamente agli istanti, con ciò la domanda di costruzione viene considerata respinta. L'autorità edilizia comunale rilascia un decreto sulle spese separato, per quanto attiene alle spese di procedura del comune.

6. Edifici e impianti esonerati dal Governo tramite ordinanza dall'obbligo della licenza edilizia non necessitano di alcun permesso EFZ, nemmeno se i comuni li hanno sottoposti alla procedura semplificata per il rilascio della licenza edilizia.

← Art. 86 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 88 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (15)

R 2023 41 · gr (Art. 87 Abs. 5 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Unlawful Structures in Agricultural Zone; Restoration Ordered

Cited in the administrative decision (Ziff. 5) to inform the municipality about issuing its own cost decision.

R 2020 96 · gr (Art. 87 Abs. 5 KRG)

Appellant v. Zoning Authority on Temporary Building Permit for Non-Construction Parcel

The court used this article to rightfully reject the request for a temporary building permit outside the construction zone (BAB-Gesuch).

R 2015 86 · gr (Art. 87 Abs. 3 KRG)

Unauthorized Basement Conversion and Ancillary Shed Modification Appeal

Cited in the context of jurisdiction if new building applications were filed after the appeal decision.

R 2015 95 · gr (Art. 87 Abs. 3 KRG)

Appeal on Denial of Demolition Permit for Weekend Hut Limited by Proven Usable Area

Provision cited by the municipality in the original challenged decision for rejecting the building application.

R 2014 114 · gr (Art. 87 Abs. 3 KRG)

Barn Conversion Permit Denial Over Alternative Site Assessment

The court remanded the case to the respondent (municipality) for re-examination and decision according to this provision.

R 2015 3 · gr (Art. 87 Abs. 1 KRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial Over Agricultural Accommodation Classification

The court noted that the cantonal authorization (BAB-Bewilligung) is required under this article, which influences the procedural steps for the municipal authority upon remand.

R 2013 175 · gr (Art. 87 cpv. 1 LPTC)

Municipality Excavation Material Removal Order Upheld

Cited in conjunction with other provisions to support the argument that municipal authorization for construction outside the building zone is subordinate to cantonal approval.

R 2011 49 · gr (Art. 87 KRG)

Owners v. Municipality Regarding Void Permits for Construction Outside Building Zone

Cited in the dispositive as the relevant article for conducting the Building Permit Procedure for Buildings Outside the Building Zone (BAB-Verfahren).

R 2011 24 · gr (Art. 87 Abs. 1 bzw. 2 des Raumplanungsgesetzes für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG))

Appeal Against Provisional Pig Farm Permit Dismissed Due to Odor Mitigation Conditions

Cited in the background as the legal basis for the provisional BAB permit granted by the ARE, supporting the final dismissal of the appeal.

R 2010 73 · gr (Art. 87 KRG)

Municipal Order to Remove Unpermitted Garden Gate Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the municipality correctly followed the required procedure for the building application.

R 2009 62 · gr (Art. 87 KRG)

Property Owner vs. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Mountain Hut Repairs

The central issue of the appeal was whether the municipality was justified in requiring the submission of a formal building application (Baugesuch) under this article.

R 2009 65 · gr (art. 87 cpv. 1 LPTC)

Co-Owner Renovation Permit Standing in Co-Owned Property

Mentioned as the provision requiring a cantonal permit for the intervention since the parcel is outside the building zone, influencing the referral order.

R 2009 65 · gr (art. 87 cpv. 3 LPTC)

Co-Owner Renovation Permit Standing in Co-Owned Property

Mentioned regarding the procedure the municipal authority must follow after the substantive review is ordered.

PVG 2007 32 · gr (Art. 87 KRG)

Municipality Permit Invalid Without Cantonal Approval for Flood Control Structure Outside Building Zone

The court orders the municipality to initiate the planning procedure ('BAB-Verfahren') according to this article for the challenged project.

R 2007 35 · gr (Art. 87 KRG)

Municipality v. Spatial Planning Approval for Flood Protection Project

The appeal was granted and the municipality was ordered to initiate the BAB procedure as per this article for the project.