Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
801.100 KRGLPTC CH-GR

Art. 79 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - In generale

Norme edilizie cantonali - Sicurezza e salute
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 79 LPTC · In generale

1. Edifici ed impianti devono corrispondere alle disposizioni di polizia sanitaria, del fuoco e dell'artigianato, nonché alle prescrizioni della legislazione sul lavoro, sull'energia, sulla protezione delle acque e sulla protezione dell'ambiente.

2. Edifici ed impianti devono soddisfare le regole riconosciute della tecnologia delle costruzioni e non devono costituire una minaccia per persone, animali e cose né durante la costruzione né durante la loro esistenza e il loro utilizzo.

3. Il Governo può prescrivere tramite ordinanza che determinati edifici ed impianti debbano essere sottoposti ad uno speciale esame delle autorità in merito alla loro sicurezza rispetto agli influssi naturali come terremoti, neve, vento.

4. Se un edificio o un impianto costituisce una minaccia per persone o animali, oppure se persone o animali sono esposti ad un pericolo immediato derivante dall'utilizzazione di edifici o impianti minacciati, l'autorità edilizia comunale obbliga il proprietario ad attuare le necessarie misure. Se questo non assolve agli obblighi entro il termine stabilito, in seguito a comminatoria l'autorità edilizia comunale fa eseguire le misure da terzi a spese degli inadempienti.

← Art. 78 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 80 LPTC →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (13)

VR3 2024 46 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 4 KRG)
Municipality's Executive Action to Complete Unfinished Facade Upheld
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding safety and health as a potential basis for the municipality's action.
VR3 2024 65 · gr (art. 79 cpv. 4 LPTC)
Heirs' Liability for Dangerous Retaining Wall Upheld
This provision is the legal basis explicitly cited for ordering the appellants to remove the dangers caused by the retaining wall (Order 1 of the challenged decision, confirmed in the final order).
VR3 2024 65 · gr (art. 79 cpv. 4 frase 2 LPTC)
Heirs' Liability for Dangerous Retaining Wall Upheld
This provision is cited to confirm the authorization for the municipality to proceed with substitute execution if the appellants fail to comply with their obligations (confirmed in Order 2 of the challenged decision, implicitly confirmed in Order 2 of the final judgment).
R 2023 63 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 2 KRG)
Slope Safety Versus Demolition Stay Appeal
This provision, concerning the obligation for buildings not to endanger people or property, underpins the court's decision to confirm the denial of suspensive effect to allow the demolition of the dangerous building.
R 2023 63 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 4 KRG)
Slope Safety Versus Demolition Stay Appeal
This provision obligates the owner to take necessary measures in case of immediate danger, supporting the need for demolition.
R 2022 32 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 2 KRG)
Municipal Building Inspection Appeal Regarding Concrete Blocks and Safety Measures
Cited as the rule that buildings and installations must comply with recognized rules of construction, which implies adherence to SIA norms for safety.
R 2021 30 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 2 KRG)
Administrative Court Upholds Appeal Against Disproportionate Landscaping Height Restriction
Cited as the fundamental rule requiring that buildings and installations must not endanger persons, animals, or property.
R 2020 61 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 1 KRG)
Municipality Building Permit Refusal Overturned Due to External Staircase Calculation
The court decision regarding the building permit implicitly relied on the requirement for compliance with health, fire, and trade police regulations, as the core issue was whether the external staircase met these criteria, leading to the final order to grant the permit subject to maintenance.
R 2020 61 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 2 KRG)
Municipality Building Permit Refusal Overturned Due to External Staircase Calculation
The court implicitly relied on the rule that buildings must adhere to recognized rules of construction and not endanger people or property, as the safety aspects of the staircase were central to the dispute resolved in the final order.
R 2018 49 · gr (Art. 79 KRG)
Appeal Against Municipal Building Permit for Basement Primary Residence Due to Circumvention Concerns
Cited regarding the requirement for buildings and facilities to comply with health, fire, and trade police regulations, as well as environmental and energy legislation.
R 2012 153 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 2 KRG)
Appeal Regarding Retrospective Approval of Non-Compliant Retaining Wall
The substantive provision forming the main ground for partially upholding the appeal, as the existing retaining wall violates its requirements.
PVG 2011 22 · gr (Art. 79 cpv. 4 LPTC)
Retroactive Building Permit Denial Due to Asbestos Violation
Cited as the basis for the authority to oblige the owner to take necessary measures if the construction poses a threat to people or animals.
U 2010 124 · gr (Art. 79 Abs. 4 KRG)
Property Owner Challenges Remedial Work Costs and Statutory Lien
Cited as the basis for charging the costs of the substitute performance, which the court found to be lawful.