801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 63 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - 2. Contributi

Pianificazione locale - Urbanizzazione

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 63 LPTC · 2. Contributi

1. I contributi vengono riscossi a copertura delle spese per la costruzione, la modifica e il rinnovo di impianti di urbanizzazione. Fanno parte delle spese soggette a contributi tutte le spese necessarie all'opera pubblica.

2. La Sovrastanza comunale stabilisce la partecipazione ai costi da parte del comune (quota parte dell'interessenza pubblica) e della collettività dei proprietari fondiari (quota parte dell'interessenza privata). A tale proposito valgono di regola i seguenti valori indicativi

1. Urbanizzazione generale

a) Quota parte del comune: 70 - 40 %

b) Quota parte dei privati: 30 - 60 %

2. Urbanizzazione particolare

a) Quota parte del comune: 30 - 0 %

b) Quota parte dei privati: 70 - 100 %

3. Per la suddivisione della quota parte dei privati tra diversi interessati, ci si basa di regola sull'utilizzazione possibile del fondo in considerazione di eventuali ulteriori vantaggi e svantaggi.

4. Gli interessati possono essere obbligati ad effettuare pagamenti in acconto fino all'ammontare delle quote parti prevedibili.

5. I debitori dei contributi sono i proprietari fondiari iscritti nel registro fondiario al momento della scadenza. Debitori dei contributi sono, in caso di proprietà comune, i proprietari comuni, in caso di comproprietà i comproprietari. In caso di diritti di superficie, debitore dei contributi è il superficiario.

6. Il Governo disciplina tramite ordinanza la procedura per la riscossione dei contributi (procedura contributiva).

← Art. 62 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 64 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (51)

A 2024 14 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 lit. a KRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Road Renovation Contribution Assessment Inclusion

Cited to contextualize the percentage division of the public interest share, although this division was not disputed.

A 2024 14 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 lit. b KRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Road Renovation Contribution Assessment Inclusion

Cited to contextualize the percentage division of the private interest share, although this division was not disputed.

PVG 2021 12 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Municipality Road Fee Cost-Sharing Challenge

Provides guidelines for the distribution of costs between public and private interests in infrastructure projects, which were used to evaluate the proportionality of the cost allocation.

A 2020 40 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Road Renovation Special Assessment Challenge

The court confirmed the cost distribution between public (30%) and private (70%) interest as being within the statutory limits set by this article for minor improvements (Feinerschliessung).

A 2020 27 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Road Renovation Cost Allocation)

The court found that the municipality's initial 50% allocation for the public interest exceeded the lower bound of the guideline range (40% - 70%) for a major development, leading to the modification of the cost split.

A 2018 48 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Road Sanitation Cost Allocation

The court determined that the cost sharing of 50% public interest and 50% private interest for the road section was correct and fell within the statutory limits for major infrastructure (Groberschliessung).

R 2014 37 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 3 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality: Cost Distribution Appeal for Development Plan and Compensation Valuation

Cited as the basis for how the private share of costs and planning costs are distributed, considering property use and advantages/disadvantages.

R 2014 19 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 5 KRG)

Cost Allocation for Road Adjustment Based on Current Ownership

Cited as the decisive rule for determining the debtor of contributions, based on land register entry at the time of maturity, which formed the basis for overturning the cost allocation.

R 2014 19 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 5 KRG)

Municipality v. Property Owner Regarding Road Widening Cost Allocation Based on Timing of Liability Accrual

The court determined that the decisive factor for assigning cost liability is the entry in the land register at the time the contributions become due, superseding the specific rule in the QPV.

A 2014 3 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Street Renovation Contribution Percentage

The court used this provision to confirm that the 30% public interest share (ÖI) for fine development (Feinerschliessung) was correct.

R 2013 131 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 KRG)

Cost Allocation Dispute in Neighborhood Development Plan

Cited in the reasoning section in connection with Art. 54 KRG, but the application detail is not the core ground for the final order.

R 2012 129 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality: Infrastructure Cost Allocation Challenge Dismissed

This provision was used to classify the sewage pipeline as Feinerschliessung and uphold the 0% public interest rate.

R 2012 129 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality: Infrastructure Cost Allocation Challenge Dismissed

This provision, regarding the split between public and private interest for infrastructure facilities (specifically Feinerschliessung), was used to justify upholding the 50% public interest rate for the water pipeline.

V 2010 3 · gr (Art. 63 KRG)

Municipal Credit Approval Challenge Based on Alleged Voter Misinformation Regarding Special Assessments

The court referenced this article to support the finding that the information allegedly given to voters regarding potential future cost contributions was not factually incorrect.

PVG 2010 22 · gr (Art. 62 Abs. 2 in Verbindung mit Art. 63 Abs. 1 KRG)

Challenge to Cost Distribution in Infrastructure Project Upheld

Cited as the legal basis for levying contributions to cover the costs of creating, changing, and renewing development facilities.