801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 60 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Attuazione 1. Competenza, negligenza

Pianificazione locale - Urbanizzazione

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 60 LPTC · Attuazione 1. Competenza, negligenza

1. L'attuazione dell'urbanizzazione delle zone edificabili e di altre zone di utilizzazione (progettazione, costruzione, esercizio, manutenzione e rinnovo) è compito dei comuni, rispettivamente degli organi responsabili da essi incaricati o concessionati, purché la Confederazione o il Cantone non siano responsabili dell'urbanizzazione.

2. Nella legge edilizia i comuni possono autorizzare privati a provvedere autonomamente all'urbanizzazione del loro terreno secondo le direttive dei piani di urbanizzazione. Se più privati partecipano ad un'urbanizzazione e non riescono ad accordarsi sulla procedura o sulla ripartizione delle spese, decide la Sovrastanza comunale.

3. Secondo il diritto federale, la Sovrastanza comunale decide in merito a pretese di privati riguardo all'urbanizzazione privata o ad anticipi in caso di mancata urbanizzazione di zone edificabili nei termini previsti dall'ente pubblico. Se viene autorizzata un'urbanizzazione privata o un anticipo, la Sovrastanza comunale, nel corso dell'esecuzione degli impianti, attua una procedura contributiva e ripartisce le spese tra tutti i fondi urbanizzati.

4. Pretese di rimborso derivanti dall'urbanizzazione privata o da anticipi vanno disciplinati nella procedura contributiva secondo il capoverso 3. Prestazioni anticipate che sono da rimborsare, vengono incluse nella procedura contributiva senza interessi.

← Art. 59 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 61 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (13)

R 2019 60 · gr (Art. 60 KRG)

Municipal Development Plan Revision Upheld Despite Property Owner Objections

Mentioned in the reasoning (Point 3.2.3) to establish the municipality's responsibility for infrastructure, which supports the necessity of the QP revision, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (Point 1).

R 2019 18 · gr (Art. 60 Abs. 1 KRG)

Challenge to Road Project Approval and Expropriation Dismissed

Cited as the basis for municipal responsibility for the planning, construction, and operation of access roads within building zones.

R 2019 19 · gr (Art. 60 Abs. 1 KRG)

Property Owners v. Canton: Road Construction Expropriation Upheld

Cited to establish the municipality's responsibility for the planning, construction, operation, maintenance, and renewal of access to development zones.

R 2010 23 · gr (Art. 60 KRG i.V. mit Art. 58 Abs. 4 KRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Development Plan and Public Turning Area

Cited in the reasoning as a legal requirement relevant to the necessity of the fine access roads and turning loop, which supports the substantive finding for remitting the decision.

A 2008 75 · gr (Art. 60 ff. KRG)

Property Owners Appeal Road Improvement Cost Apportionment Due to Power Line Relocation

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 1) as the basis for the initiation of the contribution and land acquisition procedure by the municipal executive.

PVG 2007 20 · gr (Art. 60 KRG)

Financing Infrastructure Contributions: Initiation vs. Cost Apportionment

Cited to establish the basis for municipal expenses for development that are covered by development contributions.

A 2006 12 · gr (Art. 60 ff. KRG)

Appeal Against Municipal Road Renovation Proceedings Dismissed Under Transitional Law

This provision of the new Cantonal Spatial Planning Law was discussed regarding its non-applicability to the case, but it is not cited in the dispositive.

R 2005 15 · gr (Art. 60 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Demolition Order and Fine for Protected Building Alterations

Cited as the basis for the obligation to remove a non-compliant state, although qualified by proportionality.

R 2005 15 · gr (Art. 60 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Restoration Order and Fine for Unauthorized Protected Building Modifications

Cited as a provision requiring the building owner to eliminate a non-compliant state, which is foundational to the final decision on the restoration order.

R 2004 48 · gr (Art. 60 KRG)

Consolidated Appeals Regarding Restoration Order for Unauthorized Construction Outside Building Zone

Cited in the reasoning as a legal basis for the requirement to eliminate non-compliant structures, which underpins the overall administrative action being reviewed.

R 2004 48 · gr (Art. 60 KRG)

Municipal Order for Unpermitted Structures in Agricultural Zone Upheld

Cited, along with Art. 94 BG, as the legal basis for the obligation to remove a non-compliant structure (though the final order concerns dismissal of the appeal).

R 2004 109 · gr (Art. 60 des Raumplanungsgesetzes für den Kanton Graubünden vom 20. Mai 1973 (KRG))

Municipality v. Property Owner: Enforcement of Demolition Order for Illegal Residential Conversion

Cited as one of the legal bases establishing the duty to remove a non-compliant situation.

R 2004 37 · gr (Art. 60 des Raumplanungsgesetzes für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG; BR 801.100))

Appeal Regarding Unpermitted Manure Storage Structure Compliance and Demolition Order

Cited as part of the basis for the obligation to remove a non-compliant structure, though ultimately modified by proportionality principles.