801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 5 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Procedure, termine per l'evasione

Disposizioni generali

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 5 LPTC · Procedure, termine per l'evasione

1. Per le procedure concernenti pianificazioni, progetti di costruzione, ricomposizioni particellari e la riscossione dei tributi di urbanizzazione, definite nella presente legge e nell'ordinanza, fa stato esclusivamente il diritto cantonale, nella misura in cui i comuni e le regioni non vengano esplicitamente autorizzati o obbligati ad emanare proprie prescrizioni procedurali divergenti o complementari oppure a disciplinare autonomamente determinate procedure.

2. Le autorità competenti evadono le domande nei termini ordinatori definiti nella presente legge o nell'ordinanza, qualora non sia concordato altrimenti. I termini cominciano a decorrere non appena le domande sono formalmente corrette e complete, qualora non sia stabilito altrimenti.

3. Se eccezionalmente un termine non può essere rispettato, l'autorità competente comunica il ritardo agli interessati prima della scadenza con una breve motivazione e fissa un nuovo termine per l'evasione.

← Art. 4 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 6 LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)

PVG 2011 17 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 1 KRG)

Municipal Plan Revision Invalid Due to Lack of Preliminary Resolution

Cited to establish that cantonal law exclusively governs neighborhood plan procedures.

R 2010 99 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 1 KRG)

Municipality Zoning Plan Revision Procedural Invalidity Appeal

Establishes that cantonal law governs the procedure for zoning plans, underpinning the mandatory nature of the procedural requirements cited.

A 2008 75 · gr (Art. 5 i.V.m. Art. 107 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 KRG)

Property Owners Appeal Road Improvement Cost Apportionment Due to Power Line Relocation

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 2) as the applicable procedural law for the financing in question.

V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 1 KRG)

Constitutional Appeal Against Municipal Connection Fees and Development Contributions

Cited in reasoning regarding the exclusive applicability of cantonal law for procedures, but not directly applied in the dispositive orders.

R 2007 65 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 1 KRG)

Landowner Suit for Mandatory Neighborhood Planning Denied Due to Insufficient Legal Basis and Lack of Public Interest

Cited to establish that cantonal law (KRG) exclusively governs the procedure for zoning plans.

R 2006 112 · gr (Art. 5 KRG i.V. mit Art. 85 Abs. 2 KRG und Art. 94 Abs. 2 KRG sowie Art. 4 BG)

Chimney Demolition Order Unlawful for Procedural Building Permit Violation

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the jurisdiction of the building commission to issue the restoration order.

R 2005 15 · gr (Art. 5 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Demolition Order and Fine for Protected Building Alterations

The unauthorized changes constituted a violation of formal building law (as referenced by the municipal law).

R 2005 15 · gr (Art. 5 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Restoration Order and Fine for Unauthorized Protected Building Modifications

Cited as a formal building law violation (breach of the building permit requirement) concerning the unauthorized construction, supporting the restoration order.

R 2004 126 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 1 KRG)

Municipal Council Development Plan Approval Overturned for Inadequate Environmental Measure Stipulation

Cited in the reasoning concerning the relevant procedure for the UVP, though the final decision does not explicitly cite it to justify the outcome, only procedural grounds and costs.

PVG 2003 26 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 1 KRG)

Mobile Phone Antennas Classified as Structures Requiring Building Permits

Provision used alongside Art. 22 Abs. 1 RPG to establish the requirement for official approval for construction or modification.