801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 101 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Ricorso di pianificazione 1. In generale

Tutela giuridica

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (137 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 101 LPTC · Ricorso di pianificazione 1. In generale

1. Le decisioni dei comuni relative all'emanazione dell'ordinamento base, nonché decisioni della Sovrastanza comunale relative all'emanazione o al prolungamento di zone di pianificazione possono essere impugnate entro 30 giorni dalla comunicazione pubblica con ricorso di pianificazione territoriale presso il Governo.

2. Sono legittimate ad inoltrare ricorso le persone che hanno un proprio interesse legittimo nell'impugnazione della pianificazione o che sono legittimate ad inoltrare ricorso in base al diritto federale.

3. Il Governo ha la piena facoltà di verifica. Se nella decisione di ricorso sospende l'emanazione o parti di essa, esso decide autonomamente oppure rinvia la materia al comune per una nuova decisione.

3bis Il Dipartimento istruente emana decisioni di stralcio.

4. ...

← Art. 100 LPTC Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale del Cantone dei Grigioni (LPTC) - Oggetto Art. 101a LPTC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (16)

PVG 2021 15 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 1 KRG)

Zoning Revision Precludes Direct Administrative Appeal of Private Zoning Amendment Application

The court requires that challenges regarding the scope of the planning revision be raised first within the planning appeal procedure before the Government, as stipulated in the final orders implicitly by refusing direct appeal.

R 2019 2 · gr (Art. 101 KRG)

Property Owners' Appeal Against Denial of Zoning Plan Revision Dismissed

Mentioned as the proper procedure for reviewing the legality/appropriateness of the area plan (Arealplan) which the court found should have been the avenue for the appellant's substantive complaints.

R 2017 101 · gr (Art. 101 KRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Hotel Conversion Preliminary Ruling and Zoning Suspension

This article was cited to show that the proper appeal against the planning zone decision would have been a planning appeal to the Government, which was not filed by the appellant.

U 2017 35 · gr (Art. 101 des Raumplanungsgesetzes für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG; BR 801.100))

Procurement Appeal Dismissed Regarding Winter Maintenance Contract Award Based on Weighted Criteria

Cited when explaining that no planning appeals were filed against the zoning change, making the zoning decision legally final.

R 2016 19 · gr (Art. 101 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Specificity for Second Home Use

Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of asserting claims during ongoing zoning revisions through a planning appeal.

R 2014 29 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 2 KRG)

Consolidated Appeals Regarding Building Permit for Two-Family House and Height Violations

The municipality based its initial non-admission decision on this article, but the court found the appellant legitimized, leading to the acceptance of appeal R 13 210.

R 2013 167 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 2 KRG)

Municipality's Planning Zone Overturned Regarding Asylum Center Permit

This provision concerns the right to appeal against the establishment of a planning zone, which was the subject of the planning appeal granted in part (Dispositive 1).

R 2011 78 · gr (Art. 101 und 102 KRG)

Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies in Zoning Appeal

These articles establish the requirement to file a planning appeal with the Government (Regierung) before appealing to the Administrative Court, leading to the non-admission of the appeal in order 1.

R 2009 104 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 1 KRG)

Property Owner Appeal Against Hazard Zone and Development Plan Revision

Cited in section 2.a as the rule governing the appeal of municipal decisions on the enactment of the basic order to the Government.

R 2009 104 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 3 KRG)

Property Owner Appeal Against Hazard Zone and Development Plan Revision

Cited in section 2.a to state that the Government has full review authority (Überprüfungsbefugnis) in planning appeals.

R 2009 49 · gr (Art. 4 Abs. 2 Art. 101 Abs. 4 KRG, Art. 11 Abs. 3 VRG, Art. 19 RVOG, Art. 22 RVOG, Art. 12-15 KRVO)

Municipality Denied Appeal to Revise Land Use Plan Due to Lack of Significant Change in Circumstances

The court analyzed the procedural powers of the ARE and the legal officer, finding the delegation of preparatory work to them admissible under these procedural provisions.

R 2008 76 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 4 KRG)

Quarry Approval Quashed Due to Unreviewed Noise Report Violation of Hearing Rights

Cited in the reasoning regarding the application of procedural law (VRG) in the government's appeal proceedings.

A 2008 63 · gr (Art. 101 KRG)

Property Owner vs. Municipality on Compensatory Fee for Primary Residence Obligation

Mentioned by the municipality to argue that the constitutionality of the planning zone should have been challenged via a specific appeal procedure to the Government.

R 2007 50 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 1 KRG)

Failure to Exhaust Administrative Appeals in Traffic Plan Dispute

This article, along with Art. 102 KRG, establishes the required initial appeal to the Government (Planungsbeschwerde) against municipal decisions, supporting the non-admission of the appeal.

R 2007 55 · gr (Art. 101 Abs. 1 KRG)

Mobile Network Operators' Appeal Against Municipal Antenna Planning Zone Dismissed

Mentioned in the reasoning as the provision governing future appeals if the planning zone is extended.