370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 6c Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Decisione
Principi generali della procedura - Direzione della procedura, ricusazione, termini e scambio di atti giuridici per via elettronica - Ricusazione
Art. 6c LGA · Decisione
1. Se la ricusazione è contestata, decide
a) il presidente del tribunale competente nel merito in casi di ricusazione di altri membri del tribunale;
abis) il sostituto del presidente in casi di ricusazione del presidente;
b) l'autorità collegiale, in assenza della persona interessata, in casi di ricusazione dei propri membri;
c) il Direttore del Dipartimento, in casi di ricusazione di impiegati del rispettivo Dipartimento;
d) l'autorità preposta, negli altri casi.
2. La stessa autorità decide quali atti della procedura o del processo vanno ripetuti, qualora un motivo di ricusazione già esistente venga alla luce soltanto a posteriori.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (8)
U 2017 110 · gr (Art. 6c Abs. 1 lit. d VRG)
Canton Expropriation Commission Disqualification Appeal Dismissed
Used to establish the administrative court's jurisdiction to rule on the challenge when all commission members are challenged.
R 2016 40 · gr (Art. 6a - 6c VRG)
Alpine Farming Cooperative Exclusion and Fine Unlawful Due to Lack of Legal Basis and Insufficient Justification
Cited as the provisions governing recusation in the context of municipal law according to Art. 22 para. 3 GG.
R 2013 133 · gr (Art. 6c VRG)
Inn Renovation Permit Appeal Regarding Setback Violations
Cited in the reasoning as part of the applicable procedural law for determining bias.
R 2011 68 · gr (Art. 6c VRG)
Retirement Center Expansion Permit Upheld Against Building Code Objections
Cited in reasoning regarding the procedural rules for recusal applicable to the municipal executive acting as a review body for objections.
PVG 2011 20 · gr (Art. 6c Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Building Permit Recusal Proceedings: Administrative vs. Judicial Standards
The court found that the municipal executive violated this provision by not excluding the mayor from the decision on the objection when a conflict of interest was present.
A 2011 13 · gr (Art. 6a - 6c VRG)
Property Owners v. Municipality on Second Home Tax Procedural Violations
These articles determine the rules for disqualification that the Government, acting in its judicial capacity, must follow.
A 2011 13 · gr (Art. 6c VRG)
Property Owners v. Municipality on Second Home Tax Procedural Violations
The previous decision on the motion for disqualification against Council Member X was rendered in violation of this article because the affected member was present during deliberations.
R 2011 41 · gr (Art. 6c Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Improper Participation in Recusal and Permit Decisions
The court relied on this provision to find that the cantonal board committed an error by not deciding on the request for recusal in the absence of the concerned member, which led to the annulment of the decisions.