Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
370.100 VRGLGA CH-GR

Art. 6a Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Motivi di ricusazione

Principi generali della procedura - Direzione della procedura, ricusazione, termini e scambio di atti giuridici per via elettronica - Ricusazione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (98 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 6a LGA · Motivi di ricusazione

1. Le persone che devono prendere, preparare o redigere una decisione si ricusano d'ufficio o su richiesta in procedure nelle quali

a) esse stesse, il coniuge, il partner che vive in unione domestica registrata o in una convivenza di fatto, il fidanzato, i parenti o gli affini fino al terzo grado, i genitori adottivi, i genitori affilianti, la matrigna e il patrigno, nonché i figli adottivi, i figli affiliati o i figliastri partecipano al procedimento o sono in altro modo interessati immediatamente all'esito del procedimento;

b) hanno rapporti particolari di amicizia o di inimicizia con una parte o un danneggiato o con un'altra persona interessata dal procedimento;

c) hanno speciali obblighi o un rapporto speciale di dipendenza nei confronti di una delle parti o un danneggiato o verso un'altra persona interessata dal procedimento;

d) hanno collaborato con un'altra funzione ufficiale a una decisione di un'autorità precedente nella stessa pratica;

e) sono stati testimoni o periti;

f) appaiono prevenuti per altri motivi.

2. Motivi di ricusazione secondo la lettera a continuano a sussistere dopo lo scioglimento del matrimonio, del fidanzamento, dell'unione domestica registrata o della convivenza di fatto.

3. I motivi di ricusazione conformemente alla lettera d non si applicano ai comuni.

← Art. 6 LGA Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Autorità cantonali Art. 6b LGA →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (29)

VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 6a VRG)
Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for filing a motion for recusation, which was bypassed by the failure to meet deadlines related to the original appeal, leading to the outcome in order 1.
R 2024 33 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipal Order Appeal on Unauthorized Attic Use and Fine
Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 3.5.3) to define the grounds for abstention (Ausstand) for administrative decision-makers, which was invoked regarding the bias of the municipal president.
U 2023 42 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Judges' Recusal Denied Despite Allegations of Close Association with Opposing Counsel
Used to reject the request for refusal against B._____ because no exceptional friendship warranting refusal was found.
R 2018 46 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 1 lit. d VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Building Permits and Land-Use Plan Lacks Standing
Cited in the reasoning to define circumstances for mandatory withdrawal (Ausstand) of decision-makers.
R 2018 46 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 1 lit. f VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Building Permits and Land-Use Plan Lacks Standing
Cited in the reasoning to define circumstances for mandatory withdrawal (Ausstand) of decision-makers based on other circumstances suggesting bias.
R 2018 46 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 3 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Building Permits and Land-Use Plan Lacks Standing
Cited in the reasoning to exclude the application of withdrawal grounds lit. d to municipalities.
R 2018 57 · gr (Art. 33 cpv. 3 della legge sui comuni del Cantone dei Grigioni (LCom; CSC 175.050] in combinato disposto con l'art. 6a cpv. 1 lett. a LGA)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Three Single-Family Homes Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty of abstention (recusal) of the municipal secretary, which was rejected as tardy and unfounded.
A 2018 4 · gr (Art. 6a VRG)
Application for Recusal of Administrative Judge Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning to define the conditions under which a judge must recuse themselves.
PVG 2017 31 · gr (Art. 6a VRG)
Municipal Consultant Bias in Permit Review
Although discussed, this article concerning conflict of interest for decision-makers was cited in the reasoning when discussing the scope of review, but not explicitly in the operative part as the main ground for the verdict.
R 2016 40 · gr (Art. 6a - 6c VRG)
Alpine Farming Cooperative Exclusion and Fine Unlawful Due to Lack of Legal Basis and Insufficient Justification
Cited as the provisions governing recusation in the context of municipal law according to Art. 22 para. 3 GG.
R 2016 40 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 1 lit. d VRG)
Alpine Farming Cooperative Exclusion and Fine Unlawful Due to Lack of Legal Basis and Insufficient Justification
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the appellant's objection regarding the bias (multiple capacity) of the Alpgenossenschaft president on the municipal board, although ultimately rejected as untimely.
A 2016 32 · gr (Art. 6a VRG)
Tourism Tax Assessment Validity and Equality Challenge
Cited as the basis listing the circumstances under which a judge must recuse themselves, in response to the appellants' objection of bias.
S 2016 73 · gr (Art. 6a VRG)
Disability Insurance Extension Denial Upheld Due to Counsel Diligence
Used to review and reject the appellant's request for recusal (Ausstand) of the adjudicator B._____.
PVG 2013 5 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Recusal of Officials Based on Shareholdings and Board Membership in Related Companies
The court found that the shareholding stake did not meet the requirement of an immediate interest in the outcome of the proceedings required by this article.
PVG 2013 5 · gr (Art. 6a Abs. 1 lit. f VRG)
Recusal of Officials Based on Shareholdings and Board Membership in Related Companies
The court found that the shareholding stake did not violate this provision, although it noted the provision is applicable to municipalities, contrary to the respondent's assertion.