370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 63 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Ammissibilità

Procedura dinanzi al Tribunale d'appello - Azione giudiziaria

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (98 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 63 LGA · Ammissibilità

1. Il Tribunale d'appello giudica nella procedura d'azione

a) controversie di diritto pubblico e amministrativo fra enti e istituti di diritto pubblico equivalenti nella gerarchia;

b) controversie derivanti da contratti di diritto pubblico;

c) * pretese di indennizzo risultanti dalla legge sulla responsabilità dello Stato, se nessun'altra autorità è competente a giudicare;

d) * pretese di indennizzo risultanti da operazioni legittime di enti e istituti di diritto pubblico, se vi è una base legale per farlo e nessun'altra autorità è competente a giudicare;

e) * pretese pecuniarie risultanti da un rapporto di servizio pubblico, se nessun'altra autorità è competente a giudicare;

f) * controversie di diritto pubblico e amministrativo assegnate per il giudizio al Tribunale d'appello da una norma speciale;

g) * controversie a cui partecipano le Chiese riconosciute dallo Stato o i loro comuni parrocchiali, se possono essere impugnate dinanzi al Tribunale federale, oppure che sono assegnate per il giudizio al Tribunale d'appello dalle Chiese di Stato.

2. In veste di Tribunale delle assicurazioni esso giudica nella procedura d'azione

a) controversie ai sensi dell'articolo 73 della legge federale sulla previdenza professionale per la vecchiaia, i superstiti e l'invalidità (LPP);

b) * controversie ai sensi dell'articolo 85 della legge sulla sorveglianza degli assicuratori (LSA) e dell'articolo 7 del Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero.

← Art. 62 LGA Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Autorità cantonali Art. 64 LGA →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (58)

VR1 2024 24 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)

Employee v. Hospital Foundation: On-Call Compensation in Employer Housing

Cited implicitly as the basis for the court's jurisdiction to hear the case concerning a monetary claim from a public service relationship.

U 2024 5 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)

Former Employee v. Municipality Over Post-Termination Work Compensation

Cited to establish the court's subject-matter jurisdiction over the claim arising from a public employment relationship.

U 2023 57 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit e VRG)

Employment Termination Date Following Illness During Notice Period

Cited to confirm the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court for handling monetary claims arising from public service employment in the context of the plaintiff's combined appeal/claim.

PVG 2023 19 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)

Arbitration Clause Validity in Healthcare Service Agreement Challenging Administrative Jurisdiction

The arbitration clause was declared void because it contradicted the court's jurisdiction under this article for disputes arising from public law contracts.

U 2023 70 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)

Administrative Court Jurisdiction Over Home Care Contract Termination and Arbitration Clause Validity

This provision governs the jurisdiction for disputes arising from administrative contracts, which was the relevant path for the dispute once the court determined the administrative appeal was inadmissible.

S 2023 12 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 lit. a VRG)

Pension Contribution Dispute: Contractual Breach vs. Jurisdictional Error

This article was cited in the reasoning as the basis for the Administrative Court's jurisdiction over disputes under Art. 73 Abs. 1 BVG, which was the subject of the jurisdictional review.

S 2023 15 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 lit. a VRG)

Pension Asset Division Following Divorce

Cited in consideration 1 as a basis for the court's jurisdiction to conduct the division, which is exercised in the dispositive.

U 2022 88 · gr (art. 63 cpv. 1 lett. e LGA)

Employee v. Municipality re: Untimely Appeal of Contract Termination

Mentioned in the reasoning to establish the Court's jurisdiction over the legal action.

U 2019 33 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)

Claim for Uncontracted Public Employment Services Dismissed

This article establishes the court's jurisdiction for adjudicating claims arising from public service employment relationships, which was considered for the case's subject matter.

U 2020 13 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))

Canton Liable for Bed Bug Extermination Costs in Asylum Housing Contract Dispute

Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over compensation claims under state liability law, which justifies the judgment on the merits.

S 2019 136 · gr (art. 63 cpv. 2 lett. b LGA)

Insurance Coverage Termination for Concealed Work Capacity

Cited in establishing competence (not directly applied in the dispositive).

U 2017 61 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)

State Liability Claim for Unregistered Building Restriction Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over the state liability claim, which is relevant context but not explicitly in the dispositive orders. However, based on the strict rule to only include provisions cited in the dispositive, and since the dispositive only contains orders 1, 2, 3, and 4/5 which refer to the ruling, costs, compensation, and appeal instructions, this specific procedural article is excluded unless it appeared in the operative paragraphs 1-3.

U 2019 108 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)

On-Call Response Time as Working Time

Cited in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction for the claim based on a property dispute arising from a public service relationship, which supported entering the claim.

R 2019 21 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)

Municipality's Claim for Payment on Unwritten Public-Law Contract Dismissed Due to Lack of Written Form

Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over disputes arising from public-law contracts, but is not in the dispositive, so it should be excluded based on the rules.

U 2017 73 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)

Estate of Deceased v. Public Hospital Foundation (Medical Malpractice)

Determines the administrative court's jurisdiction (sachliche und funktionelle Zuständigkeit) to rule on compensation claims under the SHG in declaratory proceedings.