370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 43 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Composizione
Procedura dinanzi al Tribunale d'appello - Norme generali - Dibattimento in Tribunale e sentenza
Art. 43 LGA · Composizione
1. Il Tribunale d'appello decide di regola nella composizione di tre giudici.
2. Il Tribunale amministrativo decide nella composizione di cinque giudici su
a) ricorsi contro decisioni del Governo o del Gran Consiglio;
b) ricorsi contro atti legislativi;
c) * questioni giuridiche di importanza fondamentale;
d) * ordine del presidente.
3. Esso decide nella composizione di giudice unico, quando
a) * il valore litigioso non supera i 10 000 franchi e non è prescritta una composizione di cinque giudici;
b) un rimedio giuridico è palesemente inammissibile o palesemente fondato o infondato.
4. Casi in cui conformemente al capoverso 3 è tenuto a decidere un giudice unico possono essere decisi in composizione di tre membri se il giudice unico competente lo dispone.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (531)
VR1 2025 74 · gr (Art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA i.u. all’art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Residence Permit Revocation Challenge
Cited as the legal basis allowing the single judge to decide the case because the appeal and the request for reinstatement were manifestly inadmissible/unfounded.
VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 3 lit. b VRG)
Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence
Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the single judge for clearly inadmissible appeals, which is the outcome in order 1.
VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 3 lit. b VRG)
Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence
Cited in the reasoning to justify the competence for a simplified decision regarding the inadmissibility in order 1.
VR2 2025 13 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 3 lit. b VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing: Property Gains Tax Deadline Based on Presumed Notification Date
Applied because the appeal was deemed inadmissible, leading to a decision by a single judge.
SV2 2025 39 · gr (art. 43 cpv. 3 lit. b LGA)
Social Insurance Objection Timeliness Appeal Review Limitation
Cited as the legal basis for judging the case as a single judge because the appeal was manifestly inadmissible or unfounded.
SV2 2025 39 · gr (art. 61 ingresso LPGA i.c.d. con l'art. 43 cpv. 3 lit. b LGA)
Social Insurance Objection Timeliness Appeal Review Limitation
Cited as the legal basis for judging the case as a single judge because the appeal was manifestly inadmissible or unfounded.
VR3 2025 72 · gr (art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA)
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Advance on Costs in Watercourse Regulation Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the judge's power to decide as a single judge when a remedy is manifestly inadmissible, which underlies the decision to declare the appeal inadmissible.
VR2 2025 47 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 3 lit. a und b VRG)
Municipal Fine Appeal Jurisdiction Challenge
Cited to establish the single-judge competence due to the non-admissibility and low value of the appeal.
SV2 2025 23 · gr (art. 61 ingresso LPGA i.c.d. con l'art. 43 cpv. 3 lit. a LGA)
Former Company Officer Liable for Unpaid Social Insurance Contributions
Cited to justify the application of the simplified procedure by the sole judge because the value in dispute was below CHF 10,000.00.
VR1 2025 31 · gr (art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA)
Municipal Budget Approval Timeliness Challenge
Used to rule that the appeal is manifestly inadmissible because the Court is judging it as a single judge due to manifest inadmissibility.
VR1 2024 1008 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 3 lit. b VRG)
Municipality vs. Property Owner on Special Road Assessment Procedure
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the single-judge decision due to the appeal being obviously unfounded, which is implicitly reflected in the dispositive by proceeding to a ruling.
SV1 2025 18 · gr (art. 61 cpv. 1 LPGA i.u. all’art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA)
Late Disability Benefits Appeal Dismissed Due to Insufficient Proof of Timely Filing
Cited to justify the decision of the sole judge in ruling on the inadmissible appeal.
VR2 2025 7 · gr (art. 43 cpv. 3 i.c.d. con l'art. 85 cpv. 2 LGA [CSC 370.100])
Taxpayer v. Tax Administration Regarding Refusal to Rectify Final Assessments Based on Newly Discovered Evidence
Cited for the decision to judge the appeal as a single judge because the appeal was manifestly ill-founded.
VR3 2023 47 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 2 lit. a VRG)
Appeal Against Partial Revision of Local Development Plan for Hotel Resort Expansion
Cited to confirm the functional jurisdiction (composition of the court).
VR2 2025 14 · gr (Art. 43 Abs. 3 lit. b VRG)
Company's Appeal on Tax Evasion Fine Inadmissible Due to Improper Procedure
Used to establish the single-judge competence based on the appeal being clearly inadmissible.