Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
370.100 VRGLGA CH-GR

Art. 40 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Convocazione

Procedura dinanzi al Tribunale d'appello - Norme generali - Prescrizioni formali e direzione della procedura
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (98 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 40 LGA · Convocazione

1. Il giudice dell'istruzione invita, d'ufficio o su richiesta, terzi, i cui interessi tutelabili sono toccati, a prendere parte alla procedura.

2. Se la persona convocata prende parte alla procedura, essa ha gli stessi diritti delle parti principali. Le possono anche venire addebitate spese.

3. La convocazione rende la decisione vincolante anche per le persone convocate.

← Art. 39 LGA Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Autorità cantonali Art. 41 LGA →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (51)

VR1 2024 92 · gr (Art. 40 VRG)
Municipality Violated Procurement Rules by Altering Price Evaluation in Zoning Contract Award
Cited in the reasoning section (E. D) for the decision to join D._____ AG as an interested party in the proceedings.
R 2024 2 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Applicant v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Condition Imposed Due to Lack of Property Owner Consent
Applied to justify imposing costs on the participating intervener (B._____ GmbH) and to establish its right to party compensation.
U 2023 36 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Professor's Procedural Appeal Against Denial of Representation Authority Dismissed
This procedural article was cited in connection with granting party compensation to the intervening parties.
S 2021 63 · gr (Art. 40 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Cooperative Member Liable for Unpaid Social Security Contributions
Cited in conjunction with Art. 61 ATSG in the reasoning regarding the basis for admitting co-litigants (Beiladung) to the procedure.
R 2019 73 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Municipal Planning Approval Upheld with Partial Amendment to Cost Allocation
Basis for ordering the losing parties (Beschwerdeführerin 1, Beschwerdeführerinnen 2, Beschwerdeführer 3, Beschwerdeführer 4, and Beigeladene) to pay court costs.
R 2019 76 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Development Plan Approval Challenged Over Access Ramp and Cost Allocation
Cited as the basis for generally imposing court costs on the appellants.
V 2019 6 · gr (art. 40 cpv. 2 LGA)
Election Recount Dispute Over Ballot Validity
Used to justify charging procedural costs to the convened party who took full part in the proceedings.
S 2018 50 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VRG)
Physician's Consultation Income Reclassified from Self-Employment to Employment for Social Security Purposes
Used to stipulate that costs can also be imposed on an involved third party (Beigeladene).
R 2019 5 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG e contrario)
Appeal Against Municipal Agricultural Land Lease Based on Factional Requirements
Used to justify not imposing costs on the intervenor B._____, as he did not participate in the proceedings.
R 2017 44 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Municipal Plan Revision Upheld Against View Preservation Challenge
The court determined that the interested party (B._____ AG) is entitled to compensation for out-of-court costs because it participated in the proceedings.
R 2017 45 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Zoning Revision Challenge Regarding Hotel and Clinic Development
Basis for granting the intervener (C._____ AG) the same rights as principal parties, relevant for awarding compensation.
R 2017 46 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Property Owner v. Municipal Zoning Revision (H._____ South)
Applied to determine the rights of the interested party (Beigeladene) to receive compensation.
R 2017 48 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 in Verbindung mit Art. 78 Abs. 1 VRG)
Cantonal Zoning Revision Conditions Upheld in H._____-hang Development Appeal
Basis for awarding party compensation to the interveners (Beigeladene) corresponding to their degree of success (4/5).
R 2017 50 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Appeal Against Partial Development Plan Revision for Health Hotel Dismissed
Used to grant the intervener (Beigeladene) the same rights as the main parties regarding costs.
R 2018 60 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Equestrian Zone Zoning Revision
Cited in the reasoning to justify granting party compensation to the joined party (Beigeladene).