Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
370.100 VRGLGA CH-GR

Art. 38 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Memorie

Procedura dinanzi al Tribunale d'appello - Norme generali - Prescrizioni formali e direzione della procedura
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (98 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 38 LGA · Memorie

1. Le memorie devono essere redatte in una lingua ufficiale e devono contenere il petito, la fattispecie e una motivazione. Esse devono essere inoltrate, allegando i mezzi di prova disponibili e la decisione impugnata. Mezzi di prova supplementari devono essere indicati esattamente.

2. Le memorie in formato cartaceo devono essere firmate e inoltrate in duplice copia.

3. Se un'istanza non soddisfa i requisiti legali o se essa è redatta in forma indecorosa, illeggibile o inutilmente estesa, viene stabilito un termine adeguato per l'eliminazione del vizio, con l'avvertimento che in caso contrario non si entrerà nel merito dell'istanza.

← Art. 37 LGA Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Autorità cantonali Art. 38a LGA →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (322)

VR1 2025 18 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. c und Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipal Traffic Restriction on Minor Access Route Upheld
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.3) as the procedural rules confirming the appeal was timely and formally correct, which led to the decision to hear the case (entry into merits).
VR3 2024 81 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)
Building Permit Conditions for Window Replacement on Historic Building
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timely submission of the appeal.
VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 VRG)
Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence
Cited in the reasoning as the formal requirement that the submission failed to meet, leading to the non-admission in order 1.
VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 VRG)
Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for setting a deadline for rectifying defects in the submission, leading to the non-admission in order 1.
VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)
Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence
Cited in the reasoning as the formal requirement that the initial submission failed to meet, leading to the non-admission in order 1.
VR3 2024 41 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 und Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)
Cantonal Watercourse Zoning Revision Upheld Against Property Owner Objection
Cited in conjunction with Art. 102 KRG to confirm that the appeal was timely and admissible for a decision on the merits.
VR1 2025 41 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)
Appeal Rejection Upheld Due to Procedural Defects and Untimely Submission
The court confirmed that the appeal was filed within the formal and time limits based on this provision.
VR3 2024 89 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection to Building Permit for Garden Shed
Cited to confirm the appeal was submitted in the correct form.
VR3 2023 47 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)
Appeal Against Partial Revision of Local Development Plan for Hotel Resort Expansion
Cited regarding the formal requirements of the appeal (although this article appears in the reasoning on admissibility, it is not explicitly cited in the final orders 1-4).
VR1 2024 92 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)
Municipality Violated Procurement Rules by Altering Price Evaluation in Zoning Contract Award
Cited in the reasoning section (E. 1.3) in conjunction with Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB to confirm that the appeal was admissible as it was filed in a timely and formal manner.
VR1 2025 10 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 VRG)
Failure to Submit Formal Appeal for Contract Award Decision
The court applied the procedure outlined in this article by setting a deadline for the appellant to correct the deficiency.
VR1 2025 10 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)
Failure to Submit Formal Appeal for Contract Award Decision
The court did not enter a decision on the appeal because the submission did not meet the requirements of this article.
SV1 2024 1076 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)
Social Assistance Deduction for Misspent Inheritance Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal was filed within the correct time and form, which is a prerequisite for entering the merits.
U 2024 50 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)
Responsibility for Social Assistance Following Majority in Supported Housing for Vocational Training
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness of the appeal.
VR3 2022 19 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 VRG)
Farmer's Agricultural Enterprise Status Appeal Regarding Cantonal Minimum Land Requirement
Cited to confirm that the formal requirements for the appeal submission were met.