370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 33 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Memorie

Procedura dinanzi alle autorità amministrative cantonali - Ricorso amministrativo - Procedura

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (98 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 33 LGA · Memorie

1. Le memorie devono essere redatte in una lingua ufficiale e devono contenere una richiesta e una motivazione. Esse devono essere inoltrate, allegando i mezzi di prova disponibili e la decisione impugnata. Mezzi di prova supplementari devono essere indicati esattamente.

2. Le memorie in formato cartaceo devono essere firmate e inoltrate in duplice copia.

3. Se un'istanza non soddisfa i requisiti legali o se essa è redatta in forma indecorosa, illeggibile o inutilmente estesa, viene stabilito un termine adeguato per l'eliminazione del vizio, con l'avvertimento che in caso contrario non si entrerà nel merito dell'istanza.

← Art. 32 LGA Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Autorità cantonali Art. 34 LGA →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)

A 2018 44 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)

Communal Tax Objection Rejection Upheld Due to Unsigned Fax Submission

This article was cited in the reasoning section concerning granting time limits for correcting defects, but it is not explicitly mentioned in the final dispositive orders (1-4).

U 2017 20 · gr (Art. 33 VRG)

Property Valuation Appeal Regarding Primary Residence Restriction and Market Conditions

Cited as the procedural rule requiring the appellant to specify in the appeal grounds which points of the contested decision are challenged and why.

U 2017 20 · gr (Art. 33 VRG)

Taxpayers Appeal Property Valuation Based on Future Legislation and Existing Residence Status

Cited in the reasoning to establish the requirement for the appealing party to specify objections in the statement of appeal (though this is a general procedural rule discussed in the considerations, not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, it is retained here as it informs the admissibility/handling of the appeal basis).

R 2015 62 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)

Landholder v. Alpine Cooperative and Municipal Board (Grazing Rights Allocation)

Cited in the reasoning when discussing the procedural requirement for the municipal board to set a deadline for a missing signature, which is relevant to the outcome of the appeal.

U 2014 26 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)

Appellant v. Department Regarding Cost Recovery for Refused Vaccination

The court found that the administrative authority should have granted the appellant a grace period to remedy the formal deficiency in the appeal application.

U 2014 26 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)

Departmental Refusal to Rule on Appeal Annulled Due to Improper Abuse of Process Finding

The court used the failure to grant a deadline for rectification under this provision as the basis for overturning the challenged non-entry decision and remitting the case.

SK2 2010 47 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)

Appeal Against Refusal to Investigate Misappropriation and Theft: Statute of Limitations Confirmed

Cited in the reasoning confirming the timeliness and proper form of the appeal, which is a procedural prerequisite.

SK2 2009 35 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)

Appeal on Battery Dismissal Remanded for Reconsideration of Evidence

Cited in the reasoning defining the required form and content of the appeal (Considerand 1).

BK 2008 35 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)

Public Prosecutor v. Negligent Horse Owner Regarding Child Injury

Cited in the reasoning concerning the formal requirements for filing the appeal (request and reasoning).

BK 2007 48 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)

Prosecutor v. Horse Owner (Negligence)

Cited in the context of the formal requirements for the appeal (request and grounds/evidence).

BK 2007 37 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)

Appellant v. Prosecutor (Fraud Dismissal Appeal)

Cited regarding the formal requirements for filing the appeal (motion and justification).

PKG 2008 17 · gr (Art. 178 Abs. 1 StPO in Verbindung mit Art. 33 ff.VRG)

Administrative Penalty Order Objection: Public Hearing Right in Subsequent Judicial Appeal

The court cited this provision as the legal basis for the lack of obligation to hold a public hearing before the administrative authority (DJSG).