370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 28 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Ammissibilità

Procedura dinanzi alle autorità amministrative cantonali - Ricorso amministrativo - Presupposti

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (98 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 28 LGA · Ammissibilità

1. Le decisioni di un servizio o di istituti dipendenti del diritto pubblico cantonale possono essere impugnate con ricorso amministrativo al Dipartimento preposto.

2. Il ricorso amministrativo è escluso, quando secondo la legge sono possibili l'opposizione o direttamente il ricorso al Tribunale d'appello.

3. Le decisioni dei Dipartimenti e della Cancelleria dello Stato possono essere impugnate con ricorso amministrativo al Governo, se ciò è espressamente previsto dalla legge.

4. Sono considerate decisioni anche il diniego di giustizia e la ritardata giustizia, nonché atti materiali che attentano ai diritti e ai doveri di persone.

← Art. 27 LGA Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) - Autorità cantonali Art. 29 LGA →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (9)

SR2 2025 13 · gr (Art. 28 Abs. 4 VRG)

Appellant v. Office for Penal Execution Delay Complaint Appeal

Cited in the reasoning to show that the DJSG considered legal delay as a decision under VRG, which the Obergericht disputes in this context.

SR2 2025 13 · gr (Art. 28 ff. VRG)

Appellant v. Office for Penal Execution Delay Complaint Appeal

Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure the DJSG mistakenly used, and the court clarifies that the JVG procedure should have been used.

A 2019 11 · gr (art. 28 cpv. 1 LGA)

Taxpayer Diligence in Challenging Tax Assessments

Cited in reasoning to describe the general appeal route, which was compared against the possibility of direct appeal.

A 2018 15 · gr (Art. 28 Abs. 4 VRG)

Taxpayer Appeal on Property Gains Tax Collection Offset

This provision was used in the reasoning to justify the admissibility of appealing factual acts, but it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

U 2014 51 · gr (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRG)

Late Administrative Appeal Dismissed Following Presumed Delivery of Speeding Penalty Notice

Cited in the reasoning to determine the deadline for administrative appeals regarding provisional measures, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.

U 2014 73 · gr (Art. 28 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 34 Abs. 1 VRG)

Student Expulsion Suspension Denial Upheld Due to Admission Rule Non-Compliance

Cited in the reasoning regarding the general rule that administrative appeals do not have suspensive effect.

R 2011 14 · gr (Art. 28 ff. VRG)

Vineyard Area Determination and Right to be Heard Violation on Remittal

Cited when discussing the broader scope of review (Kognition) for the administrative appeal authority (DVS) concerning discretion.

A 2009 39 · gr (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRG)

Tax Recourse Claim Between Heirs: Civil vs. Administrative Law Jurisdiction

This procedural rule establishes the principle that decisions are generally to be appealed to the supervising department first, which influenced the procedural discussion regarding direct appeal.

A 2009 39 · gr (Art. 28 Abs. 2 VRG)

Tax Recourse Claim Between Heirs: Civil vs. Administrative Law Jurisdiction

This provision was cited in the context of when the appeal to the supervising department is excluded, setting the stage for determining the admissibility of the direct appeal to the court.