Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.000 GOGLOG CH-GR

Art. 40 Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG) - Amministrazione del tribunale 1. Corte plenaria

Autorità giudiziarie - Tribunale d'appello - Organizzazione generale
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (122 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 40 LOG · Amministrazione del tribunale 1. Corte plenaria

1. La Corte plenaria è composta dai giudici ordinari.

2. Le competono

a) l'emanazione di ordinanze giudiziarie;

b) l'approvazione del preventivo, del conto annuale e del rapporto di gestione del Tribunale d'appello nonché delle autorità giudiziarie che si trovano sotto la sua vigilanza a destinazione del Gran Consiglio;

c) il varo di richieste a destinazione del Gran Consiglio con le quali si intende incaricare il Governo di elaborare progetti legislativi o costituzionali concernenti l'amministrazione della giustizia;

d) la costituzione delle sezioni e di eventuali camere;

e) la nomina dei presidenti delle sezioni e di eventuali camere nonché dei supplenti;

f) la nomina degli altri membri della commissione amministrativa e delle altre persone che devono essere nominate dal Tribunale d'appello;

g) il coordinamento della giurisprudenza tra le sezioni;

h) la richiesta di destituzione di giudici del Tribunale d'appello;

i) l'assunzione e il licenziamento dei collaboratori con impiego fisso;

j) l'emanazione di prese di posizione;

k) altri compiti assegnatile per legge o ordinanza.

3. Le decisioni della Corte plenaria sono valide se alla seduta o alla procedura per circolazione degli atti partecipano almeno due terzi dei membri della Corte plenaria.

← Art. 39 LOG Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG) - Oggetto Art. 41 LOG →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (22)

SK2 2023 27 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Case Transfer Due to Apparent Judicial Conflict of Interest
This article is referenced in the reasoning section concerning the court's power to assign jurisdiction to another court when replacement is necessary, although it is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders 1-5.
JAK 2023 11 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Canton v. Debtor: Designation of Impartial Court for Enforcement Opposition
The request for the appointment of an independent court was decided based on this provision.
SK2 2020 53 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Appointment of Substitute Jurisdiction for Criminal Investigation of Regional Court President
Cited in the reasoning for the request for assignment of an independent court, which was granted in order 1.
SK2 2017 48 · gr (art. 40 cpv. 2 LOG)
Regional Court Recusal Due to Clerk's Relationships
This provision was used to declare another regional court competent after the successful recusal.
SK2 2015 36 · gr (art. 40 cpv. 2 LOG)
Case Transfer Due to Appearance of Partiality in Small District Court
This provision was used to determine the procedure for appointing a substitute court after the original court was refused.
JAK 2014 14 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Estate Representative Appointment Substitution Due to Conflict of Interest
Basis for appointing the single judge of another District Court due to the official function of B._____ as Head of Chancery at the District Court X._____.
JAK 2014 14 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Estate Representative Appointment Substitution Due to Conflict of Interest
Cited in the reasoning, and relevant to the application of Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG in order 1, thus included.
JAK 2014 14 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Estate Administration Recusal and Substitution of Court
Cited as the basis for the Chamber to appoint the judge of another district court due to the established grounds for recusal concerning the court clerk.
JAK 2014 12 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Transfer of Jurisdiction Due to Conflict of Interest in Enforcement Proceedings
This provision was the basis for declaring the competence of the judge of the neighboring district (Maloja) due to the impossibility of seating judges from the original district.
JAK 2014 12 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Jurisdictional Assignment Due to Conflict of Interest in Payment Order Objection
The application was granted, designating the judge of the Maloja District Court as competent for the main matter.
JAK 2014 6 · gr (Art. 13 Abs. 2 EGzZPO in Verbindung mit Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Debt Enforcement Matter Bias Claim Against Court Denied
Cited in the reasoning to justify the court's competence to rule on the request for substitution without further examination of the grounds for recusal, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-4.
JAK 2014 6 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Debt Enforcement Matter Bias Claim Against Court Denied
Cited in the reasoning to support the court's ability to rule on substitution, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-4.
JAK 2013 22 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Appearance of Bias Justifies Substitute Court Assignment in Civil Claim Against Foundation
The Chamber declares the District Court of Imboden competent to hear the claim, following its established practice based on this provision for cases where the entire court body is disqualified.
JAK 2013 22 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Foundation Conflict of Interest Recusal of Entire District Court
Used to appoint another court when the ordinary court is unable to hear the case due to apparent bias.
JAK 2012 31 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 GOG)
Criminal Proceeding Recusal Jurisdiction Transfer
This provision is relevant to the subsequent designation of substitute judges or the declaration of jurisdiction of a neighboring court, which the Court finds should be handled by the II. Criminal Chamber (SK2) rather than the Judicial Supervisory Chamber (JAK).