173.000 GOGLOG

CH-GR

Art. 38 Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG) - Composizione

Autorità giudiziarie - Tribunale d'appello - Organizzazione generale

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (122 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 38 LOG · Composizione

1. Il Tribunale d'appello decide di regola nella composizione di tre giudici.

2. In merito a questioni giuridiche di importanza fondamentale il Tribunale d'appello decide nella composizione di cinque giudici.

3. Qualora un rimedio giuridico sia palesemente inammissibile o palesemente fondato o infondato, decide il presidente della camera con competenza di giudice unico.

4. Su disposizione del presidente il Tribunale d'appello decide nella composizione di tre giudici in merito a questioni per le quali è prevista la competenza di giudice unico nonché nella composizione di cinque giudici in merito a questioni per le quali è prevista la composizione di tre giudici.

5. Per determinati settori la legge può prevedere una composizione di cinque giudici o una competenza di giudice unico.

← Art. 37 LOG Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG) - Oggetto Art. 39 LOG →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (38)

VR1 2025 74 · gr (Art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA i.u. all’art. 38 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Residence Permit Revocation Challenge

Cited as the legal basis allowing the single judge to decide the case because the appeal and the request for reinstatement were manifestly inadmissible/unfounded.

SBK 2025 82 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Dismissal of Unsigned Appeal Against Enforcement Proceedings

This provision authorizes the single-judge decision regarding the appeal procedure.

SBK 2025 74 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Enforcement Order Reinstatement Denial Due to Untimely and Unsubstantiated Excuse

Cited as the basis for deciding the matter in a single-judge competency because the request was obviously unfounded.

SR2 2025 67 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Procedural Appeal Regarding Untimely Correction of Formal Defect in Traffic Violation Appeal

This article was cited as the basis for the single-judge decision competence to rule on the case.

SBK 2025 78 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Forced Sale Valuation Dispute

Applied to decide the evidently justified request through the competence of a single judge.

VR1 2025 54 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 GOG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Lawful Extension of Custody Pending Deportation

Cited in the reasoning when detailing the composition of the chamber, but not in the final orders.

ZR1 2025 125 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Appeal of Protective Placement Order Dismissed for Untimely Filing

This article governed the single-judge competency for issuing the decision.

SBK 2025 69 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG (BR 173.000))

Tax Enforcement Service Improper But Appeal Dismissed

Applied to render the decision in single-judge competence because the supervisory appeal proved to be manifestly unfounded.

SBK 2025 71 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG (BR 173.000))

Appeal Against Enforcement Measures Dismissed for Insufficient Specificity

Cited as the basis for the single-judge decision regarding the obviously unfounded appeal.

ZR1 2025 72 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Guardianship Upheld Despite Objection of Capacity

Basis for the single judge to decide because the appeal was obviously unfounded.

SBK 2025 57 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Supervisory Appeal Against Notice Affixed to Debtor's Door Does Not Constitute Appealable Enforcement Decision

This provision was cited as the basis for the single-judge decision because the appeal was obviously unfounded.

SBK 2025 52 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG (BR 173.000))

Seizure Notice Upheld Despite Appeal of Underlying Decision

This procedural rule is cited as the basis for the decision being rendered by a single judge because the appeal is manifestly unfounded.

ZR1 2025 63 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Custody Review Delay Complaint Dismissed as Premature

Used because the appeal was obviously unfounded and thus the decision was made in single-judge competence.

SBK 2025 39 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Appeal Against Enforcement Fees and Communication Method in Social Security Contribution Case

Applied because the supervisory appeal was deemed manifestly unfounded, allowing the decision to be rendered by a single judge.

SBK 2025 41 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG)

Creditor Appeal Dismissed in Enforcement Proceeding Over Invalid Continuation Request

Used to rule on the appeal in single-judge competence because the appeal proved obviously unfounded.