Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.000 GOGLOG CH-GR

Art. 18 Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG) - Attività informativa

Disposizioni comuni - Carattere pubblico
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (122 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 18 LOG · Attività informativa

1. Il Tribunale d'appello disciplina in un'ordinanza l'attività informativa delle autorità giudiziarie rivolta al pubblico.

2. All'interno di questa ordinanza può disciplinare l'ammissione nonché i diritti e i doveri dei cronisti giudiziari e prevedere sanzioni in caso di infrazioni.

← Art. 17 LOG Legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria (LOG) - Oggetto Art. 19 LOG →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (638)

VR3 2025 72 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Advance on Costs in Watercourse Regulation Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the judge's power to decide as a single judge when a remedy is manifestly inadmissible, which underlies the decision to declare the appeal inadmissible.
ZR2 2025 20 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG; CSC 173.000)
Debt Non-Existence Action Dismissed for Failure to Pay Procedural Costs
Cited as the legal basis for the decision being rendered by a single judge due to the evident lack of merit of the appeal.
SV1 2025 16 · gr (art. 61 LPGA i.u.all'art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA e all'art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Insurance Disability Pension Appeal Inadmissibility
Basis for deciding as a single judge because the application was manifestly inadmissible or unfounded.
KSK 2024 107 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Time-Barred Appeal of Provisional Rejection of Enforcement Opposition
Applied to justify the decision being made by a single judge because the appeal was manifestly inadmissible.
SK2 2024 61 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 des Gerichtsorganisationsgesetzes (GOG; BR 173.000))
Appeal of Non-Prosecution Decision Barred by *Ne Bis In Idem*
This article provided the basis for the chairman to decide the matter alone because the appeal was manifestly inadmissible or unfounded.
SK2 2024 67 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Deportation Detention Upheld Despite Pending Disability Appeal
The decision was rendered by a single judge based on this provision.
U 2023 50 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Municipality Refusal to Rule on Path Maintenance Upheld Due to Res Judicata and Failure to Pursue Substantive Claim
Cited alongside Art. 43 Abs. 3 VRG as the basis for the single judge deciding the case.
U 2023 85 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Appeal Regarding Landscape Protection Zone Exclusion Denied Due to Lack of Current Interest and Abusive Conduct
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1) alongside Art. 43 Abs. 3 VRG to establish the single-judge competence to rule on the manifestly inadmissible appeal, leading to the non-admission order (Order 1).
SK2 2024 65 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Weapons Act Violation Penalty Order Finality Appeal Dismissed
This article, regarding the single-judge competence of the Cantonal Court in specific cases, was cited as a basis for issuing the decision in single-judge competence.
KSK 2024 106 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Lack of Standing to Appeal Provisional Dismissal Order
The appeal was decided by a single judge because it was manifestly inadmissible.
KSK 2024 85 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Enforcement Creditor v. Debtor (Heating Cost Adjustment Enforceability)
Cited as the legal basis for the President ruling as a single judge due to the obvious unfoundedness of the appeal.
KSK 2024 98 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Enforcement Officer Subsistence Minimum Determination Upheld Due to Lack of Documentary Proof for Vehicle Costs
Used to justify the decision being rendered by a single judge due to the manifestly unfounded nature of the appeal.
ZK2 2024 37 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Company Dissolution Overruled Due to New Domicile Registration
Applied to decide the appeal by a single judge because it was manifestly well-founded.
KSK 2024 93 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unmotivated Briefing
The appeal was decided by a single judge because it was manifestly inadmissible.
ZK1 2024 194 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Protection Authority Decision Challenge
Cited as the authority under which the decision was rendered by a single judge.