Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
710.1 RPBGLATEC CH-FR

Art. 88 Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale e sulle costruzioni (LATeC) - Ricorso

Pianificazione territoriale - Pianificazione locale - Procedura per i piani e i regolamenti comunali - Piani di utilizzo delle zone, piani di dettaglio edilizio e loro regolamenti
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (208 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 88 RPBG · Ricorso

1. Le decisioni sui ricorsi del Comune possono essere impugnate con reclamo presso la Direzione.

2. Contemporaneamente all'approvazione o al rifiuto dei piani e delle disposizioni, la Direzione decide sui reclami presentati contro le decisioni sui ricorsi del Comune, riservando al Tribunale delle espropriazioni le eventuali rivendicazioni di indennizzo della proprietà, le cui proprietà immobiliari sono interessate dai piani o dalle disposizioni stesse.

3. Le decisioni della Direzione possono essere impugnate con reclamo presso il Tribunale cantonale.

← Art. 87 RPBG – Effetti dei Piani e delle Norme Legge sulla pianificazione territoriale e sulle costruzioni (LATeC) - Scopo Art. 89 RPBG →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (37)

602 2022 19 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Marshland Chalet Dismantlement Upheld Against Vested Rights Claim
Cited in conjunction with Art. 22 al. 2 LATeC to establish the admissibility of the appeal regarding cantonal spatial planning.
602 2022 20 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Chalet Dismantling on Marshland Reserve Land
Cited in the reasoning section in connection with Art. 22 al. 2 LATeC to establish the admissibility of the appeal concerning the cantonal development plan.
602 2023 170 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi fribourgeoise du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC))
Municipal Development Plan Revision Appeals: Zoning Disputes and Unbuilt Reserve Limits
Used to establish the admissibility of the appeals concerning the property owners based on a specific rule.
602 2023 47 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi cantonale du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC; RSF 710.1))
Cantonal Court Rejects Full Inconstructibility in Protected Zone Revision
Cited as one of the grounds for the admissibility of the appeal.
602 2023 15 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Landowner Appeal Regarding Agricultural to Business Rezoning Denial
Cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal regarding procedure.
602 2023 20 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Property Owner v. Canton Regarding Rezoning Denial Based on Concurrent Building Permit Requirement
Cited in the reasoning (section 1) as part of the legal basis for admitting the appeal, but not explicitly in the final orders I-IV.
602 2023 121 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi fribourgeoise du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC; RSF 710.1))
Appeal Against Expropriation for Pedestrian and Bicycle Path
Cited to establish the admissibility of the appeal concerning the Territorial Planning and Construction Act.
602 2022 40 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 de la loi fribourgeoise du 2 décembre 2008 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATeC; RSF 710.1))
Property Owner v. Municipality (Rezoning for Urban Park)
Cited as a specific procedural basis for the admissibility of the appeal.
602 2022 148 · fr (Art. 88 Abs. 3 RPBG)
Challenger Lacked Standing to Appeal Zoning Revision After Failing to Exhaust Remedies
Cited as the basis for the Cantonal Court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
602 2022 148 · fr (Art. 88 RPBG)
Challenger Lacked Standing to Appeal Zoning Revision After Failing to Exhaust Remedies
Cited to explain the next procedural step, which is the appeal to the RIMU against the municipal decision on objections.
602 2021 15 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Property Owner v. Rezoning Decision Appeal
Cited as one of the legal bases for the receivability of the appeal.
602 2021 75 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Property Owner v. Municipality over Medieval Castle Buffer Zone
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for accepting the appeal as admissible (special norm).
602 2021 29 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Property Co-owners v. Local Development Plan Modification Approval
Cited as a basis for the admissibility of the appeal before the Cantonal Court.
602 2021 145 · fr (art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
Administrative Planning Appeal Regarding Development Plan Re-publication and Agricultural Right-of-Way
Cited alongside procedural law to establish the admissibility of the appeal.
602 2021 36 · fr (Art. 88 al. 3 LATeC)
TransAgglo Route Approval Upheld Against Water Source Concerns
Cited in conjunction with Art. 37 al. 1 let. b LR to establish the Cantonal Tribunal's jurisdiction to rule on the appeals.