150.1 VRGCPJA

CH-FR

Art. 85 Codice di procedura e di giurisdizione amministrativa (CPJA) - Effetto devolutivo

Procedura - Procedura di reclamo - Effetti del reclamo

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (166 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 85 VRG · Effetto devolutivo

1. Con la presentazione del ricorso, la competenza a trattare la questione oggetto del ricorso passa all'organo giurisdizionale competente per il riesame.

2. Tuttavia, l'autorità inferiore può modificare o annullare la decisione impugnata, finché non ha inviato le proprie osservazioni sul ricorso. Essa notifica senza indugio la nuova decisione alle parti e ne informa l'organo di riesame.

3. L'organo di riesame continua a trattare il ricorso nella misura in cui questo non risulti irrilevante a causa della nuova decisione. Ha luogo un nuovo scambio di scritti qualora la nuova decisione si basi su un fatto sostanzialmente modificato o crei una situazione giuridica notevolmente mutata.

← Art. 84 VRG - Effetto Sospensivo Codice di procedura e di giurisdizione amministrativa (CPJA) - Oggetto della Legge Art. 86 VRG →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (29)

603 2024 163 · fr (Art. 85 al. 3 CPJA)

License Withdrawal Upheld for Failure to Submit Psychological Assessment

The court used this article to confirm it could continue to hear the appeal despite the lower authority modifying its decision during the appeal proceedings.

605 2023 129 · fr (art. 85 al. 2 du code fribourgeois du 23 mai 1991 de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA; RSF 150.1))

Unemployment Benefits Appeal Dismissed Due to Foreign Professional Trip and Availability

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the admissibility of the appeal despite a partial modification of the decision by the initial authority.

608 2022 37 · fr (Art. 85 Abs. 2 VRG)

Pension Ceiling Removal Date Following Judicial Separation

This procedural rule addresses the possibility of reconsideration by the lower instance, which the court noted did not happen, confirming its definitive jurisdiction.

608 2022 37 · fr (Art. 85 Abs.1 des kantonalen Gesetzes vom 23. Mai 1991 über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; SGF 150.1))

Pension Ceiling Removal Date Following Judicial Separation

This procedural rule governed the transfer of jurisdiction to the appeal court upon filing the appeal, which was a necessary step before the final judgment.

608 2022 7 · fr (Art. 85 al. 2 CPJA)

Insured's Appeal Against Unpaid Health Insurance Premiums and Debt Collection Proceedings

Cited in the reasoning as the Fribourg procedural equivalent to Art. 58 PA regarding the lower authority's right to amend or cancel the appealed decision.

608 2022 7 · fr (Art. 85 al. 3 CPJA)

Insured's Appeal Against Unpaid Health Insurance Premiums and Debt Collection Proceedings

Cited in the reasoning as the Fribourg procedural equivalent to Art. 58 al. 3 PA regarding the continuation of appeal proceedings.

601 2020 186 · fr (Art. 85 VRG)

Foreign National Warning for Reliance on Social Assistance Upheld

This procedural provision explains why the appeal became partially moot due to the lower authority's decision during the proceedings (Abweisung/Abschreibung aufgrund Gegenstandslosigkeit).

601 2020 86 · fr (Art. 85 Abs. 2 VRG)

Immigration Permit Revocation and Improper Reconsideration Procedure

The court determined it had jurisdiction to treat the application as a revision because the lower authority (Vorinstanz) had already sent its comments on the original appeal, triggering the devolutive effect.

605 2019 276 · fr (Art. 85 al. 2, 1ère phrase, CPJA)

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefit Repayment Following Suspension Modification

Cited in the reasoning as the cantonal rule allowing the lower authority to amend the decision before sending its observations, which the court considered relevant to the overall context of the re-evaluation.

605 2019 276 · fr (Art. 85 al. 3, 1ère phrase, CPJA)

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefit Repayment Following Suspension Modification

Cited in the reasoning as the cantonal rule dictating that the appeal authority continues to deal with the appeal if the new decision does not render it moot, which is relevant for the scope of the final ruling.

608 2020 84 · fr (Art. 85 al. 1 CPJA)

Caterer COVID-19 Compensation Appeal Moot Due to Retroactive Payment

This procedural rule underpins the basis for the Court assuming jurisdiction and ultimately admitting the appeal, as the lower authority's subsequent actions recognized the claimant's right.

608 2020 84 · fr (Art. 85 al. 2 CPJA)

Caterer COVID-19 Compensation Appeal Moot Due to Retroactive Payment

This procedural rule is relevant because the CAISSE's subsequent decisions (Sept 11 and 16, 2020) acknowledged the claimant's right, which the court notes is equivalent to the respondent concluding the appeal should be admitted.

608 2020 84 · fr (Art. 85 al. 3 CPJA)

Caterer COVID-19 Compensation Appeal Moot Due to Retroactive Payment

This rule governs the continuation of the appeal proceedings when the lower authority issues a decision that effectively resolves the substance of the dispute.

602 2019 145 · fr (art. 85 al. 2 CPJA)

Appeal Against Special Building Permit and Prefectural Confirmation

Cited in the reasoning to establish the authority of the lower authority to modify or cancel the contested decision, which forms the basis for the court's action in order I.

605 2019 189 · fr (Art. 85 al. 1 CPJA)

Applicant's Benefit Suspension Upheld for Insufficient Job Searches and Missed Interview

The court notes the appeal is admissible under this article, although it is not explicitly repeated in the dispositive orders I, II, or III.