150.1 VRGCPJA

CH-FR

Art. 130 Codice di procedura e di giurisdizione amministrativa (CPJA) - Procedimenti di primo grado

Costi processuali, indennizzo delle parti e patrocinio a spese dello Stato - Costi processuali

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (166 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 130 VRG · Procedimenti di primo grado

1. In primo grado le spese sono a carico della persona che richiede o provoca una decisione dell'autorità amministrativa.

2. Nell'opposizione che precede una decisione, le spese sono regolate mediante applicazione analogica dell'articolo 134, comma 1.

← Art. 129 VRG Codice di procedura e di giurisdizione amministrativa (CPJA) - Oggetto della Legge Art. 131 VRG - Procedimenti di Ricorso e Azione - Principi →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (7)

601 2024 118 · fr (art. 130 al. 1 CPJA)

Pharmacy v. Public Health Network on Alleged Disloyal Conduct After Contract Termination

Cited in the context of procedural costs in the first instance which the court partially modified.

602 2024 37 · fr (art. 130 al. 1 CPJA)

Unauthorized Construction Fine Annulled Over Lack of Due Process

The court found that charging the applicant costs for the decision violated this article.

602 2022 130 · fr (art. 130 al. 1 CPJA)

Unauthorized Construction Costs Allocation Appeal

This article governs the allocation of costs in the first instance administrative procedure, which was the basis for the decision being reviewed regarding the administrative fees.

604 2021 85 · fr (Art. 130 Abs. 1 bzw. Art. 131 Abs. 1 VRG)

Tax Court Recusal Denied for Untimely Motion and Lack of Grounds Against Entire Panel

Cited for imposing the court costs on the unsuccessful applicants.

603 2020 173 · fr (art. 130 al. 1 CPJA)

Appeal Regarding Definitive Sequestration of Wolfdogs Upheld in Part

Cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to bear the costs of the expert examination.

603 2017 17 · fr (Art. 130 Abs. 1 VRG)

Driving Privilege Reinstatement Procedural Costs Dispute

This provision was cited in the reasoning as a basis for affirming that the administrative costs charged by the commission were justified because the appellant requested or initiated the decision regarding the reinstatement of his driving license.

602 2016 120 · fr (art. 130 al. 1 CPJA)

Property Owners v. Prefecture Regarding Noise Interdiction

Cited by the lower authority in its decision (Art. 5 of the contested decision) concerning the collection of the procedural fee, although not directly used in the final orders of the Cantonal Court.