Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
150.1 VRGCPJA CH-FR

Art. 105 Codice di procedura e di giurisdizione amministrativa (CPJA) - Revisione - Motivi

Procedura - Procedimenti speciali
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (166 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 105 VRG · Motivi

1. L'autorità di giustizia amministrativa revoca la sua decisione su richiesta di revisione, se una parte

a) presenta nuovi fatti o prove rilevanti oppure

b) dimostra che l'autorità ha trascurato fatti rilevanti noti agli atti, oppure

c) dimostra che l'autorità ha violato le disposizioni sull'astensione o sul diritto di essere ascoltati.

2. Essa revoca inoltre la sua decisione d'ufficio o su richiesta di revisione, se

a) un crimine o un delitto ha influenzato la decisione oppure

b) una decisione della stessa materia da parte di un'autorità giudiziaria internazionale lo richiede, in particolare una decisione della Corte europea dei diritti dell'uomo.

3. I motivi indicati al paragrafo 1 non sono motivi di revisione, se avrebbero potuto essere avanzati nel procedimento che ha preceduto la decisione o con un ricorso contro tale decisione.

← Art. 104 VRG Codice di procedura e di giurisdizione amministrativa (CPJA) - Oggetto della Legge Art. 106 VRG →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (20)

601 2020 111 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Foreign National Deportation Appeal After Annulled Marriage
This article was cited in the reasoning to define the specific grounds for revision relevant to the reconsideration request.
603 2021 73 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Revision Denial for Previously Discoverable Facts in Land Allocation Dispute
This provision sets the ground for the court to review its decision based on new facts or evidence, which the court ultimately found inapplicable to the request.
603 2021 73 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Revision Denial for Previously Discoverable Facts in Land Allocation Dispute
This provision was used to exclude the revision because the alleged grounds could have been raised in the preceding procedure.
601 2020 86 · fr (Art. 105 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Immigration Permit Revocation and Improper Reconsideration Procedure
The revision application was rejected because it lacked new, relevant facts or evidence under this provision.
605 2019 201 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Rejection of Procedural Revision of Social Assistance Repayment Order Based on Acquittal
Although mentioned in the reasoning for admissibility checks, it is the basis for determining if a revision should proceed, specifically referencing its conditions (let. a and let. b).
605 2017 176 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Insurance Benefits Procedural Revision Rejected Due to Reinterpretation of Known Facts
Cited to specify the conditions under which the administrative court proceeds with the revision of its decision.
601 2019 150 · fr (art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Unemployment Insurance Subrogation and Employment Law Compensation Revision
The request for revision was declared inadmissible because the ground raised (change in jurisprudence) could have been invoked during the appeal procedure.
601 2019 146 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Applicant v. Detention Facility (Civil Liability Compensation and Limitation Period)
Used as the primary basis for rejecting the revision request because the asserted grounds did not constitute new and important facts or evidence.
601 2017 64 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Son's Appeal for Swiss Family Reunification Denied Due to Adulthood
Cited to define the grounds under which a revision can be requested.
602 2018 68 · fr (art. 105 ss du code fribourgeois du 23 mai 1991 de procédure et de juridiction administrative (CPJA; RSF 150.1))
Power Producer Turbine Replacement Permit Dispute
The petition was declared inadmissible because it did not meet the conditions for revision under these articles.
605 2018 185 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Claimant Denied Unemployment Benefit Revision Based on Untimely Medical Evidence
Cited as the relevant provision under which the request for procedural revision was interpreted.
605 2017 173 · fr (art. 105 al. 1 CPJA)
Applicant Seeks Procedural Revision Based on Reinterpreted Medical Evidence in Disability Claim
Cited to specify the conditions under which the administrative jurisdiction authority reviews its decision upon request.
603 2017 189 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Alcohol-Related Driving Permit Revocation
The rejection of the revision request is based on the examination of whether the criteria for revision (new important facts or means of proof) under this article were met.
603 2017 189 · fr (Art. 105 al. 3 CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Alcohol-Related Driving Permit Revocation
Although not explicitly used to reject the request, the court's reasoning implicitly relies on the scope defined by this article regarding the inadmissibility of grounds that could have been raised previously.
605 2016 257 · fr (Art. 105 al. 1 let. a CPJA)
Denial of Revision for Insurance Benefits After Tick Bite Due to Improper New Evidence
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for revision under cantonal law, but not in the final rejection order.