952.0
LBLBCRBankG
CH
CH
Art. 33 Legge federale dell'8 novembre 1934 sulle banche e le casse di risparmio (LBCR) - Ordine di fallimento e nomina dei liquidatori del fallimento
LBCR; Capo dodicesimo: Fallimento di banche insolventi (fallimento di banche)
Art. 33 LBCR · Ordine di fallimento e nomina dei liquidatori del fallimento
Se non vi è alcuna prospettiva di risanamento o se il risanamento è fallito, la FINMA revoca alla banca l’autorizzazione a esercitare, ordina il fallimento e lo rende pubblicamente noto.
La FINMA nomina uno o più liquidatori del fallimento. Essi sottostanno alla sua vigilanza e su richiesta le fanno rapporto.
I liquidatori del fallimento informano i creditori almeno una volta l’anno sullo stato della procedura.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)
BVGE-2022-IV-7 (Art. 33 al. 2 LB)
FINMA Lacks Jurisdiction in Bank Bankruptcy and Securities Claims
Cited as a basis for the FINMA's inability to intervene in the bankruptcy proceedings after liquidators have been appointed.
B-3380/2015 (Art. 33 ff. des Bundesgesetzes über die Banken und Sparkassen vom 8. November 1934 (BankG, SR 952.0))
Liquidation Upheld Over Allegations of Investigator Bias and Company Solvency
Cited as the basis for conducting bank bankruptcy proceedings analogously if a company is over-indebted or permanently insolvent.
B-1617/2013 (Art. 33 Abs. 1 BankG)
Company Bankruptcy Upheld Despite Subordination and Restructuring Arguments
Applied analogously to order the opening of bankruptcy proceedings for a financial intermediary found to be over-indebted.
B-2433/2013 (Art. 33 ss LB)
New Zealand Company Banned from Accepting Deposits in Switzerland
Mandates FINMA to order bankruptcy when there are serious reasons to fear insolvency or significant liquidity problems.
B-5272/2012 (Art. 33 Abs. 1 BankG)
Bank Liquidation Order Upheld Despite Voluntary Liquidation Claim
This provision is used to justify the mandatory withdrawal of a banking license and the initiation of bankruptcy proceedings when there is no prospect of recovery or if recovery has failed.
B-4710/2009 (Art. 33 BankG)
Company Illegally Accepted Public Deposits Via Non-Compliant Bonds
Cited as the legal basis for ordering the liquidation of the company due to its illiquidity and lack of a banking license.
B-1264/2010 (Art. 33 Abs. 1 BankG)
Swiss Companies' Bankruptcy and Liquidation Upheld Amidst Illegal Deposit-Taking Allegations
Cited as the legal basis for mandatory bankruptcy when banking license requirements are no longer met and there's no prospect of recovery.
B-3259/2009 (Art. 33 Abs. 1 BankG)
Securities Trading Ban and Bankruptcy Upheld for Unlicensed Issuing House
Legal basis for opening bankruptcy proceedings due to over-indebtedness or illiquidity.
B-4312/2008 (Art. 33 BankG)
Limited Partnerships' Real Estate Operations Not Collective Investment Schemes
Used to justify the supervisory authority's power to order dissolution for conducting business requiring a license without authorization.
B-8227/2007 (Art. 33 ff. BankG)
Supervisory Authority v. Unauthorized Securities Dealers
Provides the legal basis for liquidation and bankruptcy proceedings in cases of financial market misconduct.
B-2482/2008 (Art. 33 ff. BankG)
Banking Commission Upholds Ruling Against Companies Illegally Accepting Deposits
Applied for the liquidation of companies engaged in unauthorized banking activities and found to be over-indebted.
B-6501/2007 (Art. 36a BEHG i.V.m. Art. 33 Abs. 1 BankG)
Federal Court Upholds Securities Law Violations in Unauthorized Underwriting Case
The court used these articles to order the bankruptcy of a company when the licensing requirements are no longer met and there is no prospect of rehabilitation.
B-1645/2007 (Art. 33 ff. BankG)
Banking Commission v. Unlicensed Deposit Takers
These provisions concern bankruptcy proceedings for banks and are applied analogously to entities engaged in unlicensed banking activities, justifying the order for bankruptcy or liquidation.
CCC.1995.6952 · ne (Art. 33 LB)
Creditor's Provisional Lifting of Opposition to Payment Order Rejected Due to Prior Patent Transfer
Cited in the reasoning to support the finding that the prior contract validly transferred the right to the patent, which is the main ground for upholding the lower court's decision regarding the nullity of the subsequent contract (Art. 20 CO, mentioned in reasoning).