943.02 BGBMLMI

CH

Art. 3 Legge federale del 6 ottobre 1995 sul mercato interno (LMI) - Restrizioni del libero accesso al mercato

LMI

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (16 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 3 LMI · Restrizioni del libero accesso al mercato

Agli offerenti esterni non può essere negato il libero accesso al mercato. Le restrizioni devono rivestire la forma di oneri o condizioni e sono ammissibili soltanto se: a. si applicano nella stessa misura agli offerenti locali; b. sono indispensabili per preservare interessi pubblici preponderanti; e c. sono conformi al principio di proporzionalità.

Le restrizioni non sono conformi al principio di proporzionalità in particolare se: a. le prescrizioni del luogo d’origine garantiscono già una protezione sufficiente degli interessi pubblici preponderanti; b. i certificati e gli attestati di sicurezza già prodotti dall’offerente al luogo d’origine sono sufficienti; c. il domicilio o la sede costituisce condizione preliminare per l’esercizio di un’attività lucrativa nel luogo di destinazione; d. la pratica acquisita dall’offerente nel luogo d’origine consente di garantire una protezione sufficiente degli interessi pubblici preponderanti.

Le restrizioni ammissibili secondo il capoverso 1 non devono in alcun caso costituire una barriera dissimulata all’accesso al mercato, volta a favorire interessi economici locali.

Le decisioni concernenti le restrizioni sono prese con procedura semplice, rapida e gratuita.

← Art. 2 LMI Legge federale del 6 ottobre 1995 sul mercato interno (LMI) Art. 4 LMI →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (85)

60/2003/16 · sh (Art. 3 und Art. 5 BGBM)

Municipality's Flawed School Renovation Contract Award Due to Procedural Errors and Unfair Criteria

The violation of the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment in the award process, as detailed in the reasoning, underpins the final finding of illegality.

BGE 134 II 329 (Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. c BGBM)

Intercantonal market access under BGBM for lawyers: five-year in-canton practice requirement for training stipendiaires disproportionate.

Requires restrictions on market access to comply with proportionality, which the challenged cantonal rule violated.

BGE 134 II 329 (Art. 3 Abs. 4 BGBM)

Intercantonal market access under BGBM for lawyers: five-year in-canton practice requirement for training stipendiaires disproportionate.

Cited to clarify that the gratuitous procedure applies only to first-instance decisions and not to appeal procedures.

VB.2007.00323 · zh (Art. 3 BGBM)

Psychotherapist Licensing Disparity Between Cantons

This article determines whether the restriction of market access is permissible, although the court ultimately based its ruling on the equivalence found under Art. 2 BGBM.

VPB 2004.2321 (Art. 3 LMI)

Swiss Internal Market Law Revision

This article was used to allow restrictions on market access under certain conditions, specifically related to proportionality and the consideration of professional experience.

VPB 2000.2139 (art. 3, al. 2, LMI)

Report on Swiss Internal Market Act's Limited Impact on Service and Person Mobility

Cited as the provision allowing cantons to restrict market access under certain conditions for the preservation of predominant public interests.

VPB 2000.2139 (art. 3, al. 3, let. a, LMI)

Report on Swiss Internal Market Act's Limited Impact on Service and Person Mobility

Cited as the provision under which cantons can prove that protection cannot be achieved by regulations in the canton of origin, allowing them to oppose market access.

ZZ.1998.35 · so (Art. 3 Abs. 2 lit. e BGBM)

Notary Licensing Requirements Versus Freedom of Trade

Cited in the reasoning regarding the cantonal competence to impose conditions under the Federal Act on the Internal Market.

VB.2002.00255 · zh (Art. 3 lit. I BGBM)

Public Procurement: Permissibility and Limitation of Apprentice Training as Award Criterion

This article is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its potential relevance or use, although the dispositive itself is not fully visible to confirm direct application in the final orders beyond the listed costs/procedure.

VB.2002.00255 · zh (Art. 3 lit. II d BGBM)

Public Procurement: Permissibility and Limitation of Apprentice Training as Award Criterion

This article is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its potential relevance or use, although the dispositive itself is not fully visible to confirm direct application in the final orders beyond the listed costs/procedure.

VB.2007.00323 · zh (Art. 3 BGBM)

Psychotherapy License Denial and Equivalent Regulations

Determines whether restrictions on market access are permissible.

VB.2008.00555 · zh (Art. 3 BGBM)

Challenge to Negotiated Procedure Award Based on Implied Invitation

This provision, along with others, forms the legal basis for the final decision concerning the public procurement issue.

602 2024 92 · fr (Art. 3 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 BGBM)

Competition Commission v. Municipal Contract Award

The court found that restricting the circle of potential bidders by using the wrong procedure violated the principle of non-discrimination under this provision.

5V 24 102 · lu (Art. 3 Abs. 4 BGBM)

WEKO Appeal on Mandatory Health Insurance Authorization Fees Upheld

The basis for the appeal regarding the alleged violation of the right to a free procedure, although ultimately ruled inapplicable in the dispositive.

60/2023/11 · sh (Art. 3 EG BGBM)

Public Tender Award Challenge Concerning Timeliness, Evaluation Criteria, and Incomplete Bidding

Cited in the context of the duty of the parties to present necessary submissions within the deadline, relating to the timeliness of objections.