910.91
LBVSESTSEOTerm
CH
CH
Art. 2 Ordinanza del 7 dicembre 1998 sulla terminologia agricola e sul riconoscimento delle forme di azienda (OTerm) - Gestore
OTerm; Capitolo 2: Terminologia
Art. 2 OTerm · Gestore
Per gestore s’intende la persona fisica o giuridica oppure la società di persone che gestisce un’azienda per proprio conto e a proprio rischio e pericolo e quindi si assume il rischio d’impresa.
Se un gestore gestisce più unità di produzione, queste sono considerate come un’azienda.
...
Se un’azienda produce prodotti conformemente al titolo secondo della legge sull’agricoltura, il produttore è considerato gestore.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (16)
B-2864/2019 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 LBV)
Farmer Denied Direct Payments for Pasture Not Used on Own Account
This provision defines who is considered a farm manager, which is a prerequisite for receiving direct payments. The court found that the appellant did not meet this definition.
B-1007/2017 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 LBV)
Reclamation of Subsidies Due to Managerial Shareholding and Collaboration Agreement Violations
This provision defines a farmer and the conditions for self-management, which was relevant in determining the illegitimacy of the payments.
B-2213/2015 (Art. 2 Abs. 3 LBV)
Independent Agricultural Businesses: Merger vs. Separate Operation
The court ruled that the specific provision, in its 2014 version, could not be applied to the case due to proportionality concerns.
B-649/2016 (Art. 2 LBV)
Farmer's Direct Payment Eligibility Denied Due to Lack of Entrepreneurial Risk
Defines who qualifies as a farm manager and specifies the condition of operating on one's own account and risk.
VWBES.2017.203 · so (Art. 2 Abs. 1 der Verordnung über landwirtschaftliche Begriffe und die Anerkennung von Betriebsformen, Landwirtschaftliche Begriffsverordnung, LBV, SR 910.91)
Agricultural Operation Direct Payments Eligibility Withdrawal Appeal Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (1. and 2.). Therefore, it is excluded based on the rules.
38.2011.62 · ti (Art. 2. Se spese sono poste a carico dello Stato.)
Employer Obligation to Repay Introduction Allowances Due to Wage Default
The final order rules on the disposition of costs by stating that they are borne by the State.
B-1796/2009 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 LBV)
Farmer Entitled to Direct Payments Despite Lack of Profit in Horse Breeding Operation
Defines 'operator' as someone who runs a business on their own account and risk, which is central to determining eligibility for direct payments.
B-1055/2009 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 LBV)
Appellant Denied Direct Payments for Agricultural Land Due to Neighbor's Horse Grazing and Inadequate Record-Keeping
This provision was used to define the criteria for a farmer operating on their own account and risk.
5.BE.2009.1 · ag (Art. 2 LBV)
Bad Faith Landowner Must Repay Improper Agricultural Payments
This provision defines 'Bewirtschafter' (manager/operator), used to clarify the term's application in the case.
B-5092/2007 (Art. 2 Abs. 2 LBV)
Farmer Penalized for Exceeding Livestock Limits Despite Son's Adjacent Farm
States that multiple production sites managed by one operator are considered a single farm.
B-6936/2007 (Art. 2 Abs. 3 LBV)
Spouses Separated for Direct Payment Purposes
The court used this provision to determine whether the appellant and her husband should be considered a single farmer.
B-8363/2007 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 LBV)
Federal Administrative Court Ruling on Farm Partnership Direct Payments
Cited to define 'operator' as a natural or legal person or partnership managing a business on their own account and risk.
B-2235/2007 (Art. 2 LBV)
Farmers' direct payments upheld despite unclear land status.
Defines a farmer as a natural or legal person or partnership that runs a farm on their own account and risk.
V 04 257 · lu (Art. 2 LBV)
Manure Levy Upheld Against Farm Operator Based on Official Census Data
Cited in conjunction with Art. 11 Abs. 4 LBV to establish the appellant as the animal keeper.
FO.1999.0003 · vd (art. 2 al. 1 let. c et al. 3 OTerm 93)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Contributions Based on Exploitation Autonomy
The court implicitly used this provision (defining autonomy) as the main legal ground to rule on the recognition of the farm, although the final orders refer to the reform of the lower authority's decision which was based on denying autonomy.