814.01
USGLPELPAMB
CH
CH
Art. 32d Legge federale del 7 ottobre 1983 sulla protezione dell'ambiente (LPAmb) - Assunzione delle spese
LPAmb; Titolo secondo: Limitazione del carico ambientale; Capitolo 4: Rifiuti
Art. 32d LPAmb · Assunzione delle spese
Chi ha reso necessari provvedimenti di indagine, sorveglianza e risanamento di siti inquinati ne assume le spese.
Se sono coinvolte più persone, queste assumono le spese proporzionalmente alla loro parte di responsabilità. In primo luogo le spese sono a carico di chi, con il suo comportamento, ha reso necessario il provvedimento. Chi è coinvolto soltanto quale detentore del sito non sopporta alcuna spesa se non poteva essere a conoscenza dell’inquinamento nemmeno applicando la diligenza necessaria.
L’ente pubblico competente assume la parte delle spese dei responsabili che non possono essere individuati o che risultano insolventi.
L’autorità emana una decisione in merito alla ripartizione delle spese se uno dei responsabili lo richiede o se essa stessa esegue il provvedimento.
Se l’indagine di un sito iscritto o suscettibile d’iscrizione nel catasto (art. 32 c cpv. 2) rivela che il sito non è inquinato, l’ente pubblico competente assume le spese dei provvedimenti d’indagine necessari.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (120)
VB.2003.00446 · zh (Art. 32d USG)
Cost Allocation for Pre-1997 Environmental Remediation
This provision on cost liability for contaminated sites cleanup was discussed regarding its temporal applicability, which ultimately dictated the applicable law for this case (and was found not applicable to the costs incurred prior to July 1, 1997).
VB.2022.00331 · zh (Art. 32d USG)
Heir's Liability for Deceased's Environmental Remediation Costs
Cited as a legal provision relevant to contaminated sites remediation.
VB.2022.00581 · zh (Art. 32d Abs. 1 USG)
Contaminated Site Remediation Cost Allocation and Devolutive Effect of Appeal
This provision is cited in the context of determining the liability for environmental pollution, which is the core issue of the decision, suggesting it formed the basis for the substantive orders.
VB.2022.00581 · zh (Art. 32d Abs. 2 USG)
Contaminated Site Remediation Cost Allocation and Devolutive Effect of Appeal
This provision is cited in the context of determining the liability for environmental pollution, which is the core issue of the decision, suggesting it formed the basis for the substantive orders.
VB.2022.00581 · zh (Art. 32d Abs. 3 USG)
Contaminated Site Remediation Cost Allocation and Devolutive Effect of Appeal
This provision is cited in the context of determining the liability for environmental pollution, which is the core issue of the decision, suggesting it formed the basis for the substantive orders.
TVR.2024.Nr.29 · tg (Art. 32d Abs. 2 USG)
Universal Succession and Polluter Liability for Contamination Cleanup Costs
This provision regarding the exemption for mere site polluters (Zustandsstörer) was addressed, but the appellant's claim for relief under it was rejected.
602 2020 147 · fr (art. 32d LPE)
Landfill Remediation Cost Allocation: Municipality, State, and Company Liability for PCB Contamination
The core of the decision, as it confirms the partial decision regarding the apportionment of investigation, supervision, and remediation costs based on polluter responsibility.
VWBES.2022.7 · so (Art. 32d USG)
Cantonal Liability for Undiscovered Pre-Acquisition Contamination Costs
The core of the decision is the application and interpretation of this article regarding the allocation of investigation and remediation costs for contaminated sites.
BRGE.III.Nr.0066.20 · zh (Art. 32d Abs. 3 USG)
Appellant Heir Successfully Challenges Foreseeable Cost Liability for Contaminated Site Remediation
Used to justify that the costs of the non-identified or insolvent polluter (F, who is deceased) must be borne by the public body (Kanton Zürich).
BRGE.I.Nr.0053.2022 · zh (Art. 32d Abs. 2 Satz 3 USG)
Property Owner Appeals Contaminated Site Remediation Cost Share Despite Lack of Due Diligence Defense
The court ultimately refused to grant the exemption from cost contribution based on this provision because the appeal failed the due diligence test.
CDP.2021.160 · ne (Art. 32d LPE)
Municipality's Liability for Gasworks Pollution Investigation Costs
This provision on cost allocation (investigation, surveillance, remediation) is the central legal basis for the decision on the merits regarding cost apportionment.
VWBES.2020.280 · so (Art. 32d Abs. 1 USG)
Landowner Appeal on Remediation Cost Allocation for Contaminated Site
Cited in the reasoning to establish the polluter pays principle for investigation, monitoring, and remediation costs.
VWBES.2020.280 · so (Art. 32d USG)
Landowner Appeal on Remediation Cost Allocation for Contaminated Site
The core issue resolved (cost sharing based on polluter-pays principle) is governed by this article, although the final decision dismisses the appeal because necessary cost figures could not be established.
AC.2021.0086 · vd (Art. 32d al. 1 LPE)
Property Owner v. Maintenance Contractor: Oil Spill Cost Allocation Reassessment
Cited as the primary provision stating that the person causing the necessary measures assumes the investigation, monitoring, and clean-up costs.
AC.2021.0086 · vd (Art. 32d al. 2 LPE)
Property Owner v. Maintenance Contractor: Oil Spill Cost Allocation Reassessment
The court's decision on costs distribution is based on the criteria established in this article regarding the proportionality of responsibility shares between multiple polluters.