Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
784.40 RTVGLRTV CH

Art. 4 Legge federale del 24 marzo 2006 sulla radiotelevisione (LRTV) - Esigenze minime relative al contenuto del programma

LRTV; Titolo secondo: Emittenza di programmi svizzeri; Capitolo 1: Disposizioni generali
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (132 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 4 LRTV · Esigenze minime relative al contenuto del programma

Tutte le trasmissioni di un programma radiofonico o televisivo devono rispettare i diritti fondamentali. Le trasmissioni devono in particolare rispettare la dignità umana, non devono essere discriminatorie, né contribuire all’odio razziale, né ledere la morale pubblica, né esaltare o banalizzare la violenza.

Le trasmissioni redazionali con un contenuto informativo devono presentare correttamente fatti e avvenimenti, in modo da consentire al pubblico di formarsi una propria opinione. I pareri personali e i commenti devono essere riconoscibili come tali.

Le trasmissioni non devono compromettere la sicurezza interna o esterna della Confederazione o dei Cantoni, l’ordine costituzionale o l’adempimento degli impegni internazionali della Svizzera.

I programmi delle emittenti concessionarie devono rappresentare in modo adeguato la pluralità degli avvenimenti e delle opinioni nell’insieme delle loro trasmissioni redazionali. Se una zona di copertura è servita da un numero sufficiente di programmi, l’autorità concedente può dispensare uno o più concessionari dall’obbligo di pluralità.

← Art. 3a LRTV Legge federale del 24 marzo 2006 sulla radiotelevisione (LRTV) - Campo d’applicazione Art. 5 LRTV →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (37)

BGE 151 II 164 (Art. 4 Abs. 4 RTVG)
Broadcast of Federal Council speech before Frontex referendum: scope of diversity requirement for governmental advocacy under broadcasting law and program autonomy.
Main ground for the verdict: the Federal Supreme Court held that the broadcaster did not violate this diversity requirement by broadcasting the Federal Council speech.
VPB 150000212 (Art. 4 Abs. 2 RTVG)
Broadcaster's Correction Mitigates Further Proceedings in Factual Accuracy Case
This provision establishes the principle of objective reporting and was used to assess the broadcast's adherence to this principle.
JAAC 64.55 (Art. 4 LRTV)
Religious Broadcast Opinion Transparency
Used to assess the program's compliance with the principles of transparency and the correct presentation of events and plurality of opinions, particularly for subjective broadcasts.
JAAC 59.68 (Art. 4 al. 2 RTVG)
Hashish Interviews Not Promotion of Drug Use
This provision on the transparency principle was used to assess whether the audience could distinguish between different opinions and the presentation of facts.
JAAC 59.42 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 RTVG)
Broadcaster Censured for Misleading Dioxin Contamination Report
This provision requires that events must be presented appropriately in programs, and it was found to be violated due to manipulation of viewers and lack of journalistic due diligence.
2C_313/2025 (Art. 4 Abs. 4 RTVG)
Broadcaster's reporting on Gaza-war university protests did not violate the RTVG diversity requirement.
Main ground for the verdict: the court found no violation of the diversity requirement, thus annulling the UBI's decision.
JAAC 69.128 (Art. 4 LRTV)
Jura Plebiscite Anniversary Coverage: TV Found Biased, Radio Not
Cited as the basis for the violation regarding the faithful presentation of events and the requirement for diversity of opinions.
JAAC 69.128 (Art. 4 al. 1 LRTV)
Jura Plebiscite Anniversary Coverage: TV Found Biased, Radio Not
Cited as the legal basis for the violation of the faithful presentation of events due to the minimization of violence.
JAAC 69.71 (Art. 4 Abs. 1, 1. Satz RTVG)
Media Bias in Disability Insurance Reporting Case
The broadcaster violated the requirement for factual reporting by omitting essential facts and presenting a distorted picture of events.
JAAC 69.71 (Art. 4 Abs. 2 RTVG)
Media Bias in Disability Insurance Reporting Case
The broadcaster violated the transparency requirement by failing to mention essential facts.
JAAC 67.29 (art. 4 al. 1 1. construcziun LRTV)
Radio News Reporting on Drug Deaths Not Required to Meet Scientific Precision
This article is cited as the legal basis for the obligation to present facts objectively, which the complainant argued was violated.
JAAC 64.120 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 Satz 1 RTVG)
Misleading Footage in Salmonella Egg Report Violates Objective Reporting
This provision establishes the principle of accurate reporting, which was found to be violated by the inaccurate visual representation accompanying the news report.
JAAC 64.121 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 Satz 1 RTVG)
Broadcaster's Magazine Promotion Deemed Hidden Advertising
Mentioned as a principle potentially violated by clandestine advertising.
JAAC 64.121 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 Satz 2 RTVG)
Broadcaster's Magazine Promotion Deemed Hidden Advertising
Mentioned as a principle potentially violated by clandestine advertising.
JAAC 63.96 (Art. 4 Abs. 1 Satz 1 RTVG)
News Outlet Liable for Defamation Due to Insufficient Due Diligence
The court found that the broadcaster violated the requirement for fair presentation of events.